Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 38
AGROTEHSERVIS v. Ukraine
AGROTEHSERVIS v. Ukraine UKR 30/11/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty as well as of right to property on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26152
ASLAN v. Turkey
ASLAN v. Turkey TUR 31/03/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Late payment of compensation for expropriation and of default interest. Article 1 of Protocol No.1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30608
BECKLES v. the United Kingdom
BECKLES v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/01/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair hearing in criminal proceedings since the judge at the applicant s trial left the jury with the option of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2624
CROKE v. Ireland
CROKE v. Ireland IRL 21/03/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 11:15:23 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Absence of an independent and automatic review prior to or immediately after the applicant s initial and absence of an automatic review of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3237
DEMIR & OTHERS v. Turkey
DEMIR OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention from 16 to 23 days in police custody in Idil South Eastern region subjected to the state of emergency without any EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26766
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine UKR 07/10/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of both applicants husband and wife on account of the disproportionate use of force by the police on 7 March 2003 when EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31579
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the non motivated refusal of the competent authority the National Radio and Television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3829
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Inability of the applicant to challenge the lawfulness of his continued detention for compulsory medical treatment in the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31314
HIRST v. the United Kingdom
HIRST v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/10/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive interval between the reviews concerning the applicants continued detention as discretionary life prisoners and absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2600
I.D. v. Bulgaria
I.D. v. Bulgaria BGR 28/07/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Dismissal of the applicant s claim in labour proceedings on the ground that domestic courts considered themselves to be bound by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14605
IPEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IPEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/05/2009 00:00:00 09/11/2016 12:41:41 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Unlawful arrest and detention of minors on suspicion of being members of an illegal terrorist organisation without sufficient evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34270
JORDAN v. the United Kingdom (no. 2)
JORDAN v. the United Kingdom no. 2 GBR 10/03/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings before a court martial. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2658
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 01/07/2014 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before civil courts and administrative bodies between 1996 and 2021. The European Court criticised in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-261
MANOLE AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
MANOLE AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 17/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This case concerns undue interferences with the right of freedom of expression of journalists editors and producers working at the state television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6752
NEDELCHO POPOV v. Bulgaria
NEDELCHO POPOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/02/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inadmissibility of the applicant s action for unfair dismissal on the basis of a legal provision excluding from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14585
OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. Russia
OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. Russia RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns different violations concerning tax and enforcement proceedings brought against the applicant oil company leading to its liquidation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14112