Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 201 - 220 of 262
RUOTSALAINEN v. Finland
RUOTSALAINEN v. Finland FIN 16/09/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Violation of the right not to be punished twice as the applicant found to be driving with more leniently taxed fuel than the diesel oil his van should have been running EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5972
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia RUS 07/07/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of public access to the reasoning of judicial decisions in civil and criminal matters between 2001 and 2009 as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13659
S.C. GEROM REAL ESTATE S.A. v. Romania
S.C. GEROM REAL ESTATE S.A. v. Romania ROU 22/06/2021 00:00:00 02/07/2021 16:22:27 Case Description: This case concerns the impossibility for the applicant a company which had acquired in 2011 the assets of a former State owned company to obtain judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58009
SAHIN v. Germany
SAHIN v. Germany DEU 08/07/2003 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life and discriminatory treatment due to the dismissal of requests for access of parents to their children born out of wedlock and in one case denial of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38320
SAKIK & OTHERS v. Turkey
SAKIK OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/11/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention due to the authorities failure to present the applicants promptly and automatically before a judge and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5470
SALIYEV v. Russia
SALIYEV v. Russia RUS 21/01/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of the withdrawal in 2001 of the Magadan newspapers containing the applicant s article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13777
SANDER v. the United Kingdom
SANDER v. the United Kingdom GBR 09/08/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings relating to the lack of impartiality of a tribunal due to racist comments by some of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2522
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 28/05/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Quashing of a final judgment in criminal proceedings under the supervisory review protest procedure. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26162
SAWDEN v. the United Kingdom
SAWDEN v. the United Kingdom GBR 12/03/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2590
SCHEELE v. Luxemburg
SCHEELE v. Luxemburg LUX 17/08/2001 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-97
SCHIRMER v. Poland
SCHIRMER v. Poland POL 21/12/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts refusal to order the eviction of the applicant s tenant on the grounds that the applicant had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18189
SCHMIDT v. France
SCHMIDT v. France FRA 31/03/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of effectiveness of an appeal on points of law which was not dealt with urgently even though the proceedings at issue EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32216
SCOZZARI v. Italy
SCOZZARI v. Italy ITA 13/07/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of the applicants children in State care in a specific community and failure by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43147
SELMOUNI v. France
SELMOUNI v. France FRA 28/07/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in police custody: Ill treatment amounting to torture of a Moroccan Dutch national and excessive length of subsequent criminal proceedings to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32983
SENAS SERVIS ENDUSTRISI A.S v. Turkey
SENAS SERVIS ENDUSTRISI A.S v. Turkey TUR 06/04/2009 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Late payment of compensation for expropriation and of default interest. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26904
SENYUCEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
SENYUCEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 16/07/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:23:31 Case Description: Protection of property: excessive delays in administrative or judicial proceedings to determine compensation and gap of default interest rate in comparison with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36705
SHUMILINA v. Russia
SHUMILINA v. Russia RUS 22/03/2022 00:00:00 24/03/2022 13:54:24 Case Description: This case concerns use of lethal force that was not absolutely necessary during the arrest of the suspects in 2001 Article 2: substantive limb and unjustified delays in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59975
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande ISL 30/05/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Absence of a possibility for the applicant company to have the imposition of a fine by the labour court reviewed. Article 2 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57
SIMSEK v. Turkey
SIMSEK v. Turkey TUR 30/07/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention without any judicial review and impossibility to challenge speedily the lawfulness of the applicant s detention as he had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28579
SINGH v. the Czech Republic
SINGH v. the Czech Republic CZE 25/04/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness and excessive length of the applicants detention with a view to deportation and a lack of prompt examination of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6080