Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
BOGULAK v. Poland
BOGULAK v. Poland POL 13/09/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Detention solely on the basis of a prosecutor s decision and impossibility for the applicants to take part in or to be represented at the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17815
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/04/2021 00:00:00 23/04/2021 09:38:23 Case Description: These cases concern unjustified judicial refusals in 2013 and 2014 to register two Orthodox churches on the ground that they had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57381
HIRST v. the United Kingdom
HIRST v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/10/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive interval between the reviews concerning the applicants continued detention as discretionary life prisoners and absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2600
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. Belgium
MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. Belgium BEL 12/01/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Detention and deportation of an unaccompanied foreign minor seeking to unite with her mother: excessive length and inadequate conditions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1497
NOLAN AND K. v. Russia
NOLAN AND K. v. Russia RUS 06/07/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns numerous violations of the Convention linked to the first applicant s expulsion in 2002 from the Russian Federation: The first applicant a U.S. citizen EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13785
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PUHK v. Estonia
PUHK v. Estonia EST 10/05/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: No punishment without law: Retrospective application of penal law resulting in the conviction of the applicant under the Penal Codes of 1993 and 1995 respectively for acts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3065
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
RANA v. Hungary
RANA v. Hungary HUN 16/07/2020 00:00:00 23/07/2020 11:27:33 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal in 2016 to change the transgender refugee applicant s name and sex marker from female to male due to a gap in the relevant legislation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55665
SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/12/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to property Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 due to an interference with their shareholding in a limited liability EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3857
STEFANOV v. Bulgaria
STEFANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 03/08/2001 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for having refused to serve in the army on the ground of conscientious EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14281
TONSBERGS BLAD AS AND HAUKOM v. Norway
TONSBERGS BLAD AS AND HAUKOM v. Norway NOR 01/06/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation of a newspaper company and its editor in chief following the publication of an article about seaside EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-191
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
VEEBER v. Estonia (no. 2)
VEEBER v. Estonia no. 2 EST 21/04/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: No punishment without law: Retrospective application of penal law resulting in the conviction of the applicant under the Penal Codes of 1993 and 1995 respectively for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3059
WLOCH v. Poland
WLOCH v. Poland POL 22/01/2001 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Unlawful detention lack of adversarial principle in the review proceedings and excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17769