Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 181 - 200 of 343
KRYVITSKA AND KRYVITSKYY v. Ukraine
KRYVITSKA AND KRYVITSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 02/03/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to respect for home as the applicants having been tenants were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31573
KURLOWICZ v. Poland
KURLOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/09/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of this group concern violations of the right to freedom of expression Article 10 due to the applicants politicians journalists or editors criminal conviction to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20608
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: For the situation with the Jehovah s Witnesses in the Russian Federation see the separate notes in the cases Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and Others and Krupko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13635
L.D. v. France
L.D. v. France FRA 17/06/1994 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: The finding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31389
LAINE v. France
LAINE v. France FRA 17/04/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:09:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before commercial courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32383
LANZ v. Austria
LANZ v. Austria AUT 01/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to interference with defence rights in that contacts with the defence counsel during detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-779
LANZA v. France
LANZA v. France FRA 18/09/1996 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:59:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: The finding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31691
LARKOS v. Cyprus
LARKOS v. Cyprus CYP 18/02/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to protection of private life and home: Unlawful discriminatory treatment of a government tenant living in an area regulated by the Rent Control Law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1966
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 22/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure to strike a fair balance between the interests of the applicant landowners the lessors and the leaseholders the lessees notably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-207
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LOTTER AND LOTTER v. Bulgaria
LOTTER AND LOTTER v. Bulgaria BGR 19/05/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Freedom of religion and discrimination: Discriminatory interference due to the withdrawal of Jehovah s Witnesses residence permits and the order to leave the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14303
LUTZ v. France
LUTZ v. France FRA 26/06/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before administrative courts and lack of an effective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33155
MAGALHAES PEREIRA v. Portugal
MAGALHAES PEREIRA v. Portugal PRT 26/05/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Irregularities and delays in the examination of the lawfulness of the applicant s detention in a secure psychiatric unit and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9399
MAHMUT KAYA v. Turkey
MAHMUT KAYA v. Turkey TUR 28/03/2000 00:00:00 09/11/2016 14:24:03 Case Description: In the former Aksoy group of cases the European Court found a number of different violations resulting from actions of security forces in particular in the southeast of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34566
MAIRE v. Portugal
MAIRE v. Portugal PRT 26/09/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unlawful interference due to the authorities failure to enforce judicial decisions relating to the exercise by the applicant of custody of his child EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9963
MALAMA v. Greece
MALAMA v. Greece GRC 06/09/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Inappropriate determination of the compensation for expropriation by the national court taking no account of the excessive length of the proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22712
MALO v. Albania
MALO v. Albania ALB 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants impossibility after having been tried in absentia and their requests for leave to appeal out of time having been accepted by the courts to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50155
MARTINEZ MARTINEZ v. Spain
MARTINEZ MARTINEZ v. Spain ESP 18/01/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Failure of authorities to put an end to the adverse effects of the exposure to night noises from a discotheque situated in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5756
MATTHEWS v. the United Kingdom
MATTHEWS v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/07/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex due to the applicant s lack of entitlement to travel free on public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2602