Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 281 - 300 of 383
PLAKHTEYEV AND PLAKHTEYEVA v. Ukraine
PLAKHTEYEV AND PLAKHTEYEVA v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of property rights and functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court to claim damages for a wrongful fine and the unjustified seizure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31124
PLASSE-BAUER v. France
PLASSE BAUER v. France FRA 28/05/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:59:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of sufficient efforts to enforce a domestic court decision awarding visiting rights to a mother and laying down the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31804
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia ARM 12/09/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Lack of effective remedy under Armenian law to apply for compensation for the non pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant in connection with his ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-459
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455
PONOMARYOVI v. Bulgaria
PONOMARYOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 28/11/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Discrimination of the applicants Russian nationals who at the time had irregular immigration status in Bulgaria in the enjoyment of their right to education because in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3873
PONUSHKOV v. Russia
PONUSHKOV v. Russia RUS 06/02/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violation of the right to individual petition Article 34 or to private life Article 8 on account of perusal of the applicants correspondence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13833
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2)
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova no. 2 MDA 06/03/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concern the violation of the applicants right to a fair hearing on account of the quashing of domestic final judgments between 2004 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6810
PROKOPOVICH v. Russia
PROKOPOVICH v. Russia RUS 18/02/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Unlawful eviction of the applicant from a flat after the death of her late partner who held tenancy rights to the flat. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27530
PROSHKIN v. Russia
PROSHKIN v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern unlawful detention of persons of unsound mind during and after criminal proceedings against them in different regions between 2003 and 2006 violation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13767
PUGLIESE v. Italy
PUGLIESE v. Italy ITA 03/10/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and effective functioning of justice: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants and excessive length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43755
PUZINAS v. Lithuania
PUZINAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/06/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unlawful interference due to the monitoring and censoring of the applicant s letters in prison. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4183
QUARTUCCI v. Italy
QUARTUCCI v. Italy ITA 28/03/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43479
QUINN v. Ireland
QUINN v. Ireland IRL 21/03/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 11:15:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to respect the right to remain silent and not to incriminate oneself following suspicion of having committed terrorist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3239
RECHTOVA v. the Czech Republic
RECHTOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/09/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to Constitutional Court due to its restrictive interpretation of the admissibility rules. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6392
REFIK KARAKOC v. Turkey
REFIK KARAKOC v. Turkey TUR 10/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference with the applicants freedom of expression due to their conviction under former Anti terrorism Law and/or seizure of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30234
REGALOVA v. the Czech Republic
REGALOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 03/10/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to Constitutional Court due to its restrictive interpretation of the admissibility rules. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6314
RELIGIONSGEMEINSCHAFT DER ZEUGEN JEHOVAS AND OTHERS v. Austria
RELIGIONSGEMEINSCHAFT DER ZEUGEN JEHOVAS AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 31/10/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of religion / discrimination / functioning of justice: Unjustified interference without relevant and sufficient reasons EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-471
RIBAC v. Slovenia
RIBAC v. Slovenia SVN 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discrimination on the account of the authorities refusal to grant the applicant an old age pension on the ground that he had not had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49169
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/10/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life access to information: Absence of an effective and accessible procedure enabling the applicant s access to all relevant and appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2508
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg LUX 25/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Searches conducted at the home and the workplace of a journalist and at the chambers of the his lawyer following the publication in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-109