Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7
BATALINY v. Russia
BATALINY v. Russia RUS 14/12/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the first applicant on account of his forced psychiatric treatment in the absence of an established medical need EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13974
KUCERA v. Slovakia
KUCERA v. Slovakia SVK 17/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and protection of home: Failure to examine promptly the applicants requests for release from detention on remand excessive length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7861
L.M. v. Slovenia
L.M. v. Slovenia SVN 12/09/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of private life: Unlawful involuntary confinement in the closed wards of the Idrija and Ljubljana Psychiatric Hospitals and the open ward EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7414
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
STOYANOV AND TABAKOV v. Bulgaria
STOYANOV AND TABAKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 26/02/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: All of these cases concern the failure by different administrative authorities to comply with final domestic judgments obliging them to deliver a non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1915
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
Y.F. v. Turkey
Y.F. v. Turkey TUR 22/10/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to fact that the applicant s wife was forced to undergo a gynaecological examination after having been taken into police EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5474