Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 39
ADAMCO v. Slovakia
ADAMCO v. Slovakia SVK 12/02/2020 00:00:00 06/03/2020 15:25:13 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s conviction in 2007 2011 which was based to a decisive degree on an accomplice s statements the use of which had not been accompanied by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54865
APARICIO NAVARRO REVERTER AND GARCIA SAN MIGUEL Y ORUETA v. Spain
APARICIO NAVARRO REVERTER AND GARCIA SAN MIGUEL Y ORUETA v. Spain ESP 10/04/2017 00:00:00 02/06/2017 09:05:24 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing before administrative courts due to the failure to notify the applicant owners EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46905
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 12/04/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:59:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and effective remedy: Excessive length of civil labour criminal and enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5038
B.V. v. Belgium
B.V. v. Belgium BEL 02/08/2017 00:00:00 11/09/2017 09:42:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of serious and thorough investigations carried after the applicant had lodged a criminal complaint alleging rape and indecent assault. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47595
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/04/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Detention decided in the Army by the Commanding Officer who does not present EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2674
CALMANOVICI v. Romania
CALMANOVICI v. Romania ROU 01/10/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Cases mainly concerning irregularities of detention: unjustified extension of the detention on remand lack of immediate appeal against court decisions extending detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16415
DRAGOJEVIC v. Croatia
DRAGOJEVIC v. Croatia HRV 15/04/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to respect for their private life and correspondence on account of their unlawful surveillance between 2007 2008 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12061
EVGENI IVANOV v. Bulgaria
EVGENI IVANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/08/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of pre trial detention and failure to bring the applicant promptly before a judge as well as deficiencies in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14790
EXEL v. the Czech Republic
EXEL v. the Czech Republic CZE 05/10/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing and infringement of defence rights in property restitution proceedings and in bankruptcy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6096
FEDOTOV v. Russia
FEDOTOV v. Russia RUS 25/01/2006 00:00:00 20/02/2018 08:33:34 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in temporary police holding facilities for criminal suspects IVS under the authority of the Ministry of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14084
IEREMEIOV v. Romania (no 1)
IEREMEIOV v. Romania no 1 ROU 24/02/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Unjustified interferences with freedom of expression for opinions expressed on issues of public interest unfairness of criminal proceedings on account of the appellate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17387
IGRANOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
IGRANOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/10/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: This case concerns the failure to afford an opportunity for incarcerated applicants to attend court hearings in civil cases to which they were parties violation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50287
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/06/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These two cases concern inhuman and degrading conditions of detention violations of Article 3 . In the Insanov case the applicant a former Minister of Health Care was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1801
JAKUB v. Slovakia
JAKUB v. Slovakia SVK 28/05/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings some of them concerning disputes which should have been resolved with special diligence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8101
JAVOR AND JAVOROVA v. Slovakia
JAVOR AND JAVOROVA v. Slovakia SVK 01/02/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Excessive length of proceedings concerning a compensation claim attached to criminal proceedings and excessive length of criminal proceedings lasting for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7717
KASTE v. Norway
KASTE v. Norway NOR 09/02/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the applicants could not directly question one of the co accused whose depositions made to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-197
KAYA v. Austria
KAYA v. Austria AUT 08/09/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of certain administrative criminal proceedings for not hearing the applicant in person. Art. 6 1 and 3 c Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-963
KORMACHEVA v. Russia
KORMACHEVA v. Russia RUS 14/06/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in this respect as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13541
KOVAC v. Croatia
KOVAC v. Croatia HRV 12/10/2007 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lacking opportunity to challenge a witness statement which was of decisive importance for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12201
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213