Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 301 - 320 of 427
PAUL AND AUDREY EDWARDS v. the United Kingdom
PAUL AND AUDREY EDWARDS v. the United Kingdom GBR 14/06/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protection the applicants son s life in detention on remand and lack of effective investigations into his violent death EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2628
PAUNOVIC AND MILIVOJEVIC v. Serbia
PAUNOVIC AND MILIVOJEVIC v. Serbia SRB 24/08/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: Electoral rights: termination of an MP s parliamentary mandate on the basis of an undated resignation letter requested by his party as condition for his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7186
PAVLIK v. Slovakia
PAVLIK v. Slovakia SVK 30/04/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of compensation award by the Constitutional Court. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7975
PEDICINI v. Italy
PEDICINI v. Italy ITA 10/06/2009 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Unjustified interference with private life due to the application of limitations to the applicant s personal capacity deriving from being registered as bankrupt and lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44531
PELISSIER AND SASSI v. France
PELISSIER AND SASSI v. France FRA 25/03/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the requalification of charges by the Court of Appeal during the deliberations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32981
PESKOVA v. the Czech Republic
PESKOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/02/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of property: Absence of adequate and reasonable compensation for the privation of property acquired under the communist regime. Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6270
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
PICHUGIN v. Russia
PICHUGIN v. Russia RUS 18/03/2013 00:00:00 07/11/2016 10:37:05 Case Description: These cases 1 concern violations of the applicant s right to liberty and to a fair trial in the context of two sets of criminal proceedings which ended with his conviction on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-23422
PICHUGIN v. Russia
PICHUGIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: These cases 1 concern violations of the applicant s right to liberty and to a fair trial in the context of two sets of criminal proceedings which ended with his conviction on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47013
PINCOVA AND PINC v. the Czech Republic
PINCOVA AND PINC v. the Czech Republic CZE 05/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the restitution to its former owner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6060
PLASSE-BAUER v. France
PLASSE BAUER v. France FRA 28/05/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:59:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of sufficient efforts to enforce a domestic court decision awarding visiting rights to a mother and laying down the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31804
PRENCIPE v. Monaco
PRENCIPE v. Monaco MCO 16/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:29:50 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of the applicant s pre trial detention. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11062
PRIKYAN AND ANGELOVA v. Bulgaria
PRIKYAN AND ANGELOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 16/05/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of adversarial proceedings before the Supreme Court of Cassation due to the inability to submit arguments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14607
PRINCIPE v. Italy
PRINCIPE v. Italy ITA 19/12/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of tax administrative proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42913
PRIZZIA v. Hungary
PRIZZIA v. Hungary HUN 11/09/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning violations of the applicants right to respect for family life on account of the authorities failure to take effective steps to enforce the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10599
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION 'ETICA' v. Romania
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION ETICA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2018 00:00:00 16/08/2018 15:03:14 Case Description: In December 2007 police officers proceeded without any order issued by a prosecutor to a search at the applicant organisation s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50091
QUEMAR v. France
QUEMAR v. France FRA 01/05/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in which the applicants were either accused or civil parties and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32711
QUINN v. the United Kingdom
QUINN v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/04/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to denial of access to legal advice during the first 24 to 48 hours of detention in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2398
R.K. AND A.K. v. the United Kingdom
R.K. AND A.K. v. the United Kingdom GBR 30/12/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy to establish a local authority s responsibility for damage suffered and to obtain compensation for taking the applicants daughter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2806
R. v. Finland
R. v. Finland FIN 30/08/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of the authorities to take adequate measures to reunite the applicant with his son placed in foster care. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4822