Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 27
ADEISHVILI (MAZMISHVILI) v. Russia
ADEISHVILI MAZMISHVILI v. Russia RUS 16/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant on account of the overcrowded conditions of his detention in the special detention centre for foreigners in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14044
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. the Republic of Moldova
CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE S PARTY v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 14/05/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 12:58:25 Case Description: Freedom of association: Unjustified interference with the right to peaceful assembly through imposition of sanctions for holding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14201
DUMANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
DUMANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 07/03/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:59:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings mainly before administrative bodies Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5040
GORGULU v. Germany
GORGULU v. Germany DEU 26/05/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life: Refusal to give custody to the father of a child born out of wedlock and living with a foster family without considering the long term effects on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38410
GOULANDRIS AND VARDINOGIANNI v. Greece
GOULANDRIS AND VARDINOGIANNI v. Greece GRC 16/09/2022 00:00:00 28/10/2022 11:08:42 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the first applicant s right not to be tried or punished twice on account of the imposition in 2004 of an administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61684
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/06/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These two cases concern inhuman and degrading conditions of detention violations of Article 3 . In the Insanov case the applicant a former Minister of Health Care was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1801
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. Russia
KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. Russia RUS 06/07/2005 00:00:00 07/10/2016 11:21:54 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus mostly in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9
KHLYUSTOV v. Russia
KHLYUSTOV v. Russia RUS 11/10/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a violation of the freedom of movement on account of the temporary international travel restrictions issued between 2003 and 2014 by the bailiff EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13923
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
LAWYER PARTNERS, A.S. v. Slovakia
LAWYER PARTNERS A.S. v. Slovakia SVK 06/11/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unjustified refusal by domestic courts to register actions submitted by the applicant company in electronic form EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8441