Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 361 - 380 of 458
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the recalculation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54303
SABALIC v. Croatia
SABALIC v. Croatia HRV 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns discrimination against the applicant due to the failure of the domestic authorities to effectively discharge their procedural obligation under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57443
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744
SALIBA AND OTHERS v. Malta
SALIBA AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 22/02/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Disproportionate control by the State from 1951 to 1993 of the applicants use of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4115
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SAN ARGIMIRO ISASA v. Spain
SAN ARGIMIRO ISASA v. Spain ESP 28/12/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Failure to carry out an in depth and effective investigation into arguable allegations of ill treatment during arrest and detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5742
SANDOR LAJOS KISS v. Hungary
SANDOR LAJOS KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the appellate courts upholding criminal convictions held in camera without holding a public hearing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10499
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SARISHVILI-BOLKVADZE v. Georgia
SARISHVILI BOLKVADZE v. Georgia GEO 19/10/2018 00:00:00 07/12/2018 12:05:13 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to fulfill their positive obligation to protect the life of the applicant s son from medical negligence after an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50723
SARKIZOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
SARKIZOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Automatic ban to leave the country on the ground of a lacking rehabilitation fallowing a criminal conviction. The bans remained in force not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14471
SATIK v. Turkey (no 2)
SATIK v. Turkey no 2 TUR 08/10/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for expressing non violent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36778
SAVATIN v. Romania
SAVATIN v. Romania ROU 13/12/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 16:48:18 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment suffered by the applicant in 2010 as a result of the conduct of the law enforcement officers substantive violation of Article 3 . Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45757
SAVINY v. Ukraine
SAVINY v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unjustified interference due to insufficient evidence or inadequate assessment of evidence for the decision to remove three children from their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31846
SCHLUMPF v. Switzerland
SCHLUMPF v. Switzerland CHE 05/06/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Unfair civil proceedings related to the reimbursement of sex change operation costs due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4752
SCHWEIZERISCHE RADIO- UND FERNSEHGESELLSCHAFT SRG v. Switzerland
SCHWEIZERISCHE RADIO UND FERNSEHGESELLSCHAFT SRG v. Switzerland CHE 21/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:13:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Interference with a TV and radio company rights on account of the refusal by the domestic authorities to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5910
SEIDOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
SEIDOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 18/02/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Right to life: Ineffective investigation into the death of a relative following an attack by private individuals due to the impossibility for the family members EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14237
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/12/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern discrimination against the applicants on account of their ineligibility to stand for election to the Presidency of Bosnia and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3141
SENIGO LONGUE AND OTHERS v. France
SENIGO LONGUE AND OTHERS v. France FRA 10/10/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Protection of family life: Delays and lack of transparency in family reunification proceedings and failure to give due consideration to the applicants who EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28457
SHANOVSKYY v. Ukraine
SHANOVSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 13/10/2022 00:00:00 18/10/2022 14:54:25 Case Description: The case concerns the arbitrary continued psychiatric detention of the applicant ordered by the courts in 2010 disregarding the medical reports indicating the improvement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61473
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 21/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: The case concerns the collective expulsion by Italy to Greece of four migrants intercepted as stowaways on ferries arriving in the port of Ancona between January EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15559