Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 35
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY TUR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the application of urban planning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39509
BALASOIU v. Romania (no. 2)
BALASOIU v. Romania no. 2 ROU 20/03/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to protect the applicant s reputation following a police report describing her in unfavorable terms added EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16741
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BORGOVAN v. Romania
BORGOVAN v. Romania ROU 30/11/2021 00:00:00 03/12/2021 09:55:36 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings brought by the applicant against a bar association due to divergent domestic courts case law concerning the access to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58975
D.H. AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
D.H. AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 13/11/2007 00:00:00 12/06/2018 11:57:23 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination in the enjoyment by the applicants of their right to education due to their much higher likelihood because of their Roma 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group concerns numerous breaches of the applicants freedom of assembly through the dispersal of unauthorised peaceful demonstrations not posing any threat to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1743
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GURBAN v. Turkey
GURBAN v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: This group of cases concern violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants sentences to aggravated life EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36750
GUVEC v. Turkey
GUVEC v. Turkey TUR 20/04/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment for detaining the applicant a minor for five years in a prison for adults as well as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37407
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KARAOSMANOGLU AND OZDEN v. Turkey
KARAOSMANOGLU AND OZDEN v. Turkey TUR 17/09/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: lack of a hearing to examine the prolongation of detention on remand during six months and inability to obtain compensation. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37346
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LIBLIK AND OTHERS v. Estonia
LIBLIK AND OTHERS v. Estonia EST 07/10/2019 00:00:00 23/10/2019 11:45:51 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the lack of sufficient reasoning of the preliminary investigation judges and prosecutors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54071
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581