Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 49
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
DIMCHEVSKA v. North Macedonia
DIMCHEVSKA v. North Macedonia MKD 04/04/2023 00:00:00 06/04/2023 10:52:14 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial as she was unable in 2017 2020 to obtain a fresh determination by a domestic court of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-63039
DODOJA v. Croatia
DODOJA v. Croatia HRV 24/09/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: This case concerns the inability for the applicant to examine a co defendant who had been absent from trial whose statements were of decisive importance for his conviction in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58561
DRAGOJEVIC v. Croatia
DRAGOJEVIC v. Croatia HRV 15/04/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to respect for their private life and correspondence on account of their unlawful surveillance between 2007 2008 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12061
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
GABRIELYAN v. Armenia
GABRIELYAN v. Armenia ARM 10/07/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Gabrielyan 8088/05 judgment of 10/04/2012 final on 10/07/2012 Manucharyan 35688/11 judgment of 24/11/2016 final on 24/02/2017 Asatryan 3571/09 judgment of 27/04/2017 final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-351
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group concerns numerous breaches of the applicants freedom of assembly through the dispersal of unauthorised peaceful demonstrations not posing any threat to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1743
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania ROU 27/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified interferences with the freedom of expression as a result of court decisions delivered in 2008 and 2017 respectively holding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47937
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Inability of the applicant to challenge the lawfulness of his continued detention for compulsory medical treatment in the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31314
GURBAN v. Turkey
GURBAN v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: This group of cases concern violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants sentences to aggravated life EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36750
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
ISAAK v. Turkey
ISAAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37298
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
KESKIN v. the Netherlands
KESKIN v. the Netherlands NLD 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: These cases concern the domestic courts refusal to allow the applicant defendants to cross examine prosecution witnesses whose statements were used as evidence in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57461
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 17/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of police compliance with their duty of diligence on account of their failure to preventively confiscate a gun from a student whose internet EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56529
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213