Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 561 - 580 of 724
ROTONDO AND OTHERS v. Italy
ROTONDO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 24/11/2022 00:00:00 15/12/2022 17:14:34 Case Description: These cases concern the non execution or delay in the execution of domestic decisions in the framework of a compensatory remedy Pinto to victims of excessively EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62230
ROZSA v. Hungary
ROZSA v. Hungary HUN 28/07/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court s decisions resulting in the applicants inability to seek compensation in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10501
RUOTSALAINEN v. Finland
RUOTSALAINEN v. Finland FIN 16/09/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Violation of the right not to be punished twice as the applicant found to be driving with more leniently taxed fuel than the diesel oil his van should have been running EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5972
RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS v. Russia
RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Electoral rights protection of property functioning of justice and lack of remedy: Disproportionate and unlawful refusal of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13549
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
S.C. ANTARES TRANSPORT S.A. AND S.C. TRANSROBY S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. ANTARES TRANSPORT S.A. AND S.C. TRANSROBY S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 15/03/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns the withdrawal in 2006 without compensation of six licences to operate public transport services on a group of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13113
S.C. CARBOCHIM S.A. CLUJ-NAPOCA AND S.C. FENEGA IMPORT-EXPORT S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. CARBOCHIM S.A. CLUJ NAPOCA AND S.C. FENEGA IMPORT EXPORT S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 17/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right of access to a court due to the fact EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45915
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to ensure the effectiveness of available procedural safeguards and to act with appropriate due diligence in managing and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48329
S.M. v. Croatia
S.M. v. Croatia HRV 25/06/2020 00:00:00 23/07/2020 11:27:33 Case Description: Prohibition of forced labour: Lack of an effective investigation into the applicant s allegations of human trafficking and/or forced prostitution. Article 4 procedural limb EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55651
SABALIC v. Croatia
SABALIC v. Croatia HRV 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns discrimination against the applicant due to the failure of the domestic authorities to effectively discharge their procedural obligation under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57443
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744
SAHIN KUS v. Turkey
SAHIN KUS v. Turkey TUR 07/09/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s removal from his teaching post as a result of subsequent unforeseeable amendments in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37238
SAKAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey
SAKAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 20/01/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s right not to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment on account of lack of sufficient personal space in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37294
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SAMPANI AND OTHERS v. Greece
SAMPANI AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 29/04/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to the right to education: Failure to provide schooling for and subsequent placement in special classes of 98 Roma children and in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15693
SANADER v. Croatia
SANADER v. Croatia HRV 06/07/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair trial on account of the fact that the domestic courts did not grant the applicant the reopening of criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10149
SARA v. the Republic of Moldova
SARA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/01/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary arrest and detention of the applicant in criminal proceedings without him having a formal procedural status of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7138
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan AZE 16/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: The case concerns a refugee of Armenian origin who was forced to flee from his home during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1717
SARICA AND DILAVER v. Turkey
SARICA AND DILAVER v. Turkey TUR 04/10/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:27:27 Case Description: Sarica and Dilaver Kahyaoglu 37203/05 and Halil Gocmen 24883/07 cases mainly concern a violation of the right to property on account of de facto expropriation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37066