Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 261 - 280 of 609
KISLAKCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
KISLAKCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 27/02/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: Protection of property rights / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference on account of the administrative courts failure in the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48997
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants torture or other forms of ill treatment by police agents during their arrest questioning transfer to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6582
KIYUTIN v. Russia
KIYUTIN v. Russia RUS 15/09/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Discriminatory refusal of residence permits to foreign nationals on account of their HIV positive status the law permitting no individualised evaluation of their capacities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14026
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOLU v. Turkey
KOLU v. Turkey TUR 02/11/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicants convictions on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37214
KOMMERSANT MOLDOVY v. the Republic of Moldova
KOMMERSANT MOLDOVY v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 09/04/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of the Economic Court s order to close a newspaper on the grounds that certain articles EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6770
KONYV-TAR KFT AND OTHERS v. Hungary
KONYV TAR KFT AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: The case concerns the three applicant companies de facto exclusion in 2013 from the school book distribution contracts and the end of their business after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51883
KOPRIVNIKAR v. Slovenia
KOPRIVNIKAR v. Slovenia SVN 24/04/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: No punishment without law: Failure of domestic courts to ensure observance of the principle of legality as the overall penalty imposed on the applicant was in violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47233
KORKMAZ v. Turkey
KORKMAZ v. Turkey TUR 13/10/2020 00:00:00 03/11/2020 18:11:46 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to right to a fair trial on account of the lack of legal assistance while in police custody while in police custody in 2000 as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56125
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine UKR 21/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative responsibility proceedings due to the lack of adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the second EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31130
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KOTENKO AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOTENKO AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 20/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the domestic courts failure to consider an argument of substance advanced by the applicants which may have EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52298
KOULIAS v. Cyprus
KOULIAS v. Cyprus CYP 26/08/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to objectively justified doubts regarding the impartiality of the Supreme Court s presiding judge in civil defamation proceedings as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55839
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KOVESI v. Romania
KOVESI v. Romania ROU 05/08/2020 00:00:00 18/08/2020 10:08:56 Case Description: This case concerns the inability of the applicant the former Chief Prosecutor of the National Anticorruption Directorate DNA to challenge effectively the undue premature EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55693
KRAVCHUK v. Ukraine
KRAVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 22/04/2021 00:00:00 23/04/2021 09:38:23 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab. Status of Execution: On 17 July 2021 the authorities submitted an action report see EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57373
KUDESHKINA v. Russia
KUDESHKINA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to disciplinary proceedings leading to her dismissal in 2004 from judicial office for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13926
KUKLIK v. the Czech Republic
KUKLIK v. the Czech Republic CZE 04/10/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: Protection of property: Lack of a legal basis for domestic regulation of rent control due to a temporary legal vacuum. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50409
KUKSA v. Russia
KUKSA v. Russia RUS 15/09/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure or serious delay by the State in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions awarding housing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14120
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213