Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BUDIMIR v. Croatia
BUDIMIR v. Croatia HRV 09/05/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of his dismissal from work as a certified motor vehicle inspector due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60381
CROWTHER v. the United Kingdom
CROWTHER v. the United Kingdom GBR 06/07/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessively lengthy enforcement of a confiscation order imposed on the applicant by the Customs and Excise in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2640
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to freedom of expression due to criminal or civil convictions between 2000 and 2011 for invading the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5968
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KALUCZA v. Hungary
KALUCZA v. Hungary HUN 24/07/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to private life Article 8 on account of the authorities failure since 2005 to fulfil their positive obligation to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10977
M.A. v. France
M.A. v. France FRA 02/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The M.A. case concerns the enforcement on 20 February 2015 of a removal order against the applicant an Algerian national who was sentenced in 2006 in France to seven years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50021
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TRAJKOVSKI AND CHIPOVSKI v. North Macedonia
TRAJKOVSKI AND CHIPOVSKI v. North Macedonia MKD 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: This case concerns an unjustified interference with the applicants right to respect for their private life due the indefinite retention of their DNA EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55579