Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 102
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 30/11/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The violations found in the 16 judgments currently 1 examined in this group originated in structural deficiencies in the mechanisms set up in Romania as of 1990 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12742
SUDITA KEITA v. Hungary
SUDITA KEITA v. Hungary HUN 12/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the stateless applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the protracted failure of the authorities notably for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55805
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31302
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/06/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of criminal Stoine Hristov no. 2 and civil Svetlozar Petrov proceedings violations of Articles 6 1 1 before the most EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3731
TARMAN v. Turkey
TARMAN v. Turkey TUR 21/02/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to protect the applicant s reputation due to the dismissal of her claims for damages against the editor in chief and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49025
TARVYDAS v. Lithuania
TARVYDAS v. Lithuania LTU 23/02/2022 00:00:00 14/03/2022 11:34:31 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the domestic courts to address arguments raised by applicant in decisions of 2018 ordering him to restore an unlawfully demolished house EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59855
THEODOROU AND TSOTSOROU v. Greece
THEODOROU AND TSOTSOROU v. Greece GRC 05/12/2019 00:00:00 17/12/2019 16:24:16 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicants right to marry on account of the 2015 annulment by the Court of Cassation of their marriage due to their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54445
TONIOLO v. San Marino and Italy
TONIOLO v. San Marino and Italy SMR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:41:24 Case Description: Unlawful detention pending extradition: Domestic law was not sufficiently accessible precise and foreseeable in its application to avoid the risk of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11208
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
TV VEST AS & ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. Norway
TV VEST AS ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. Norway NOR 11/03/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Imposition of a fine on a television broadcasting company and a political party by the State Media Authority for breaching EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-203
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
UKRAINE-TYUMEN v. Ukraine
UKRAINE TYUMEN v. Ukraine UKR 22/02/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of property rights and functioning of justice: Arbitrary deprivation of bona fide owners of their possessions in the Ukraine Tuymen case part of the company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31330
ULKE v. Turkey
ULKE v. Turkey TUR 24/04/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants repetitive prosecutions and convictions for refusing to carry out compulsory military service as pacifists and conscientious objectors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37268
UNIFAUN THEATRE PRODUCTIONS LIMITED AND OTHERS v. Malta
UNIFAUN THEATRE PRODUCTIONS LIMITED AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 15/08/2018 00:00:00 29/08/2018 11:04:33 Case Description: This case concerns the complete ban by the Maltese authorities on the production of the theatrical play Stitching in 2009 which was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50105
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
VENSKUTE v. Lithuania
VENSKUTE v. Lithuania LTU 11/03/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrariness of detention by the State Border Guard Service without proper records of her arrest or the questioning as a suspect being EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4307
VOLODINA v. Russia
VOLODINA v. Russia RUS 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54227
VOLODINA v. Russia (no. 2)
VOLODINA v. Russia no. 2 RUS 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59319
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984