Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 54 of 54
SAKAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey
SAKAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 20/01/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s right not to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment on account of lack of sufficient personal space in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37294
SCHIRMER v. Poland
SCHIRMER v. Poland POL 21/12/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts refusal to order the eviction of the applicant s tenant on the grounds that the applicant had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18189
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767
STANKOVA v. Slovakia
STANKOVA v. Slovakia SVK 31/03/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of home: Disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to respect for her home following her eviction without being offered alternative accommodation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8105
STATILEO v. Croatia
STATILEO v. Croatia HRV 10/10/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property between 1997 and 2015 on account of statutory limitations on the use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12093
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania ALB 21/05/2020 00:00:00 18/08/2020 10:08:56 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant a person suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was found not criminally liable for attempted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55687
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
T.B. v. Switzerland
T.B. v. Switzerland CHE 30/07/2019 00:00:00 23/08/2019 14:58:08 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant who was executing a prison sentence for violent crimes and undergoing a psychiatric treatment in the security wing of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52647
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TARAKHEL v. Switzerland
TARAKHEL v. Switzerland CHE 04/11/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:13:37 Case Description: Risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 in case of an Afghan asylum seeking family s return to Italy under Dublin II Regulation without the authorities having first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5920
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
X v. Turkey
X v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection against discrimination / protection against ill treatment: Sustained discrimination and inhuman and degrading treatment on account of the homosexual applicant s detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37196
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 16/10/2018 15:10:36 Case Description: This group of cases concerns interferences with the applicants right to respect for their home or their private and family life as a result of eviction or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1924
ZEHENTNER v. Austria
ZEHENTNER v. Austria AUT 16/10/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Protection of private life and of property: Disproportionate interference with a legally incapacitated person s right to respect for her home due to the judicial sale of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-475