Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
CEGOLEA v. Romania
CEGOLEA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: In Romania the Constitution reserves one seat in the Chamber of Deputies to each national minority whose organisations do not attain the electoral threshold. This case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55723
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
KALANYOS AND OTHERS v. Romania
KALANYOS AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 26/07/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Discriminatory attacks and ensuing judicial proceedings: Destruction of houses of Roma villagers by local population the poor living conditions of the victims and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16105
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
LOFFELMANN v. Austria
LOFFELMANN v. Austria AUT 12/06/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discrimination on the ground of religion: Discriminatory rejection of the objection made by members of the religious community of Jehova s witnesses not to perform EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-925
MOLLA SALI v. Greece
MOLLA SALI v. Greece GRC 19/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: The case concerns the invalidation by domestic courts in 2013 of the notarized public will of the applicant s deceased husband on the grounds that wills and intestate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51081
ORSUS AND OTHERS v. Croatia
ORSUS AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 16/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Discrimination and right to education: Discriminatory treatment of Roma children in two primary schools in the Medimurje area due to the lack of objective and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10085
RELIGIONSGEMEINSCHAFT DER ZEUGEN JEHOVAS AND OTHERS v. Austria
RELIGIONSGEMEINSCHAFT DER ZEUGEN JEHOVAS AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 31/10/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of religion / discrimination / functioning of justice: Unjustified interference without relevant and sufficient reasons EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-471
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/12/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern discrimination against the applicants on account of their ineligibility to stand for election to the Presidency of Bosnia and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3141
SPORER v. Austria
SPORER v. Austria AUT 03/05/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discriminatory treatment during custody proceedings of fathers of children born out of wedlock: difference in treatment as regards the judicial scrutiny in the attribution of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1081
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825