Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 25
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GLADYSHEVA v. Russia
GLADYSHEVA v. Russia RUS 03/06/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants property rights on account of the decisions taken by the domestic authorities between 2008 and 2017 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14032
JONES v. Romania
JONES v. Romania ROU 03/05/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Various actions by which the administration delayed the return of a property nationalized during the communist regime. Status of Execution: The property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16391
KEEGAN v. the United Kingdom
KEEGAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 18/10/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure by the police to verify the connection between the address and the offence under investigation before carrying out a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2995
KOCH v. Germany
KOCH v. Germany DEU 17/12/2012 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:24:56 Case Description: Protection of private life: Procedural violation due to domestic courts refusal to examine the merits the applicant s motion to declare unlawful the rejection by the Federal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38218
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
LARISA ZOLOTAREVA v. Russia
LARISA ZOLOTAREVA v. Russia RUS 26/10/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / home: Interference due to the bailiff s unlawful manner to carry out the applicant s eviction and the domestic courts failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13815
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan AZE 19/07/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The seven remaining applicants in this group the former Ilgar Mammadov group are human rights defenders civil society activists and a journalist. They were all the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50875
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to irregularities in the conduct of search and seizure in the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31088
PAUDICIO v. Italy
PAUDICIO v. Italy ITA 12/11/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure by the authorities to comply with an order for the demolition of a building unlawfully built close to the applicant s home despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28224
PETROV AND IVANOVA v. Bulgaria
PETROV AND IVANOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 30/06/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases of this group concern breaches to the right to presumption of innocence of the first applicant in the case of Petrov and Ivanova and of the applicant in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3571
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION 'ETICA' v. Romania
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION ETICA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2018 00:00:00 16/08/2018 15:03:14 Case Description: In December 2007 police officers proceeded without any order issued by a prosecutor to a search at the applicant organisation s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50091
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. Poland
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. Poland POL 28/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of family and home: Degrading treatment by the police when determining the owner of an unlocked car parked in front of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39856
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns the demolition in 2013 of a building in an Albanian coastal town in which the applicants owned flats and business premises in disregard of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49665
SOBIESKI-CAMERZAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SOBIESKI CAMERZAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/02/2018 00:00:00 16/02/2018 14:47:48 Case Description: Protection of private life and home and lack of effective remedy / protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unlawful seizure by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48927