Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 117
NAVALNYY v. Russia
NAVALNYY v. Russia RUS 15/05/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 16:43:37 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49511
NAVALNYY v. Russia
NAVALNYY v. Russia RUS 15/11/2018 00:00:00 22/11/2018 10:36:08 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50807
NAVALNYY v. Russia (no. 2)
NAVALNYY v. Russia no. 2 RUS 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52759
NAVALNYYE v. Russia
NAVALNYYE v. Russia RUS 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49187
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NIKULA v. Finland
NIKULA v. Finland FIN 21/06/2002 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction under the Criminal Code following certain statements made by her as a lawyer during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4810
NORDICA LEASING SPA v. Italy
NORDICA LEASING SPA v. Italy ITA 14/01/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court resulting in the applicant companies inability to recover sums due to them in proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43943
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan AZE 01/05/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of of the right to freedom of association on account of the authorities a unlawful de facto refusals to register the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1607
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
ROMAN v. the Republic of Moldova
ROMAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: Protection of private life/home: Failure of the authorities to discharge their obligation to protect the applicant from the noise caused by the activity of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54291
S.B.F. S.P.A. v. Italy
S.B.F. S.P.A. v. Italy ITA 20/09/1997 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court resulting in the applicant companies inability to recover sums due to them in proceedings sought EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45162
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine UKR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:42:52 Case Description: The case concerns an interference with the journalist s right to the protection of her sources in 2018 due to judicially authorised access to her mobile telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58305
SHAMAYEV AND 12 OTHERS v. Georgia and Russia
SHAMAYEV AND 12 OTHERS v. Georgia and Russia GEO RUS 12/10/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: The case concerns a certain number of violations found in relation to the detention and extradition by Georgia to Russian Federation of thirteen EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5808
SIVOVA AND KOLEVA v. Bulgaria
SIVOVA AND KOLEVA v. Bulgaria BGR 04/06/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1903
SOBIESKI-CAMERZAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SOBIESKI CAMERZAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/02/2018 00:00:00 16/02/2018 14:47:48 Case Description: Protection of private life and home and lack of effective remedy / protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unlawful seizure by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48927
SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. Ukraine
SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. Ukraine UKR 06/11/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 13:25:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty due to the objection protest procedure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25689
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767