Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 60 of 83
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NISIOTIS v. Greece
NISIOTIS v. Greece GRC 20/06/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and/or degrading treatment of the applicants on account of the poor conditions of detention of the applicants in overcrowded prisons in Greece EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15760
NORDICA LEASING SPA v. Italy
NORDICA LEASING SPA v. Italy ITA 14/01/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court resulting in the applicant companies inability to recover sums due to them in proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43943
NYKANEN v. Finland
NYKANEN v. Finland FIN 20/08/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the right not to be punished twice as the applicants were convicted in both criminal and administrative taxation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6022
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Structural problem highlighted by the Court applying the pilot judgment procedure: violations of the applicants right of access to a court and right to peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7092
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
PAVLETIC v. Slovakia
PAVLETIC v. Slovakia SVK 10/11/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention delay in the ruling on a request for release no decision had been delivered and lack enforceable right to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7831
PILLA v. Italy
PILLA v. Italy ITA 02/06/2006 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:19:39 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention due to the belated delivery of a decision on remission of sentence i.e. after the date of actual release leading to an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-41789
PISKIN v. Turkey
PISKIN v. Turkey TUR 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national courts to conduct an in depth thorough examination of the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57513
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION 'ETICA' v. Romania
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION ETICA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2018 00:00:00 16/08/2018 15:03:14 Case Description: In December 2007 police officers proceeded without any order issued by a prosecutor to a search at the applicant organisation s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50091
RANA v. Hungary
RANA v. Hungary HUN 16/07/2020 00:00:00 23/07/2020 11:27:33 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal in 2016 to change the transgender refugee applicant s name and sex marker from female to male due to a gap in the relevant legislation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55665
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/10/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life access to information: Absence of an effective and accessible procedure enabling the applicant s access to all relevant and appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2508
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
ROSTOMASHVILI v. Georgia
ROSTOMASHVILI v. Georgia GEO 08/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: These cases concern unfair criminal proceedings and trial against the applicants. In particular the Rostomashvili case concerns the failure by the authorities to give EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51447
ROZANSKI v. Poland
ROZANSKI v. Poland POL 18/08/2006 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Lacking protection of family life due to inability of a putative father to seek legal paternity by means of a procedure directly accessible to him introduction of such a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39878
S.B.F. S.P.A. v. Italy
S.B.F. S.P.A. v. Italy ITA 20/09/1997 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court resulting in the applicant companies inability to recover sums due to them in proceedings sought EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45162
SARICA AND DILAVER v. Turkey
SARICA AND DILAVER v. Turkey TUR 04/10/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:27:27 Case Description: Sarica and Dilaver Kahyaoglu 37203/05 and Halil Gocmen 24883/07 cases mainly concern a violation of the right to property on account of de facto expropriation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37066
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine UKR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:42:52 Case Description: The case concerns an interference with the journalist s right to the protection of her sources in 2018 due to judicially authorised access to her mobile telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58305
SELYGENENKO AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
SELYGENENKO AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 21/01/2022 00:00:00 04/02/2022 11:30:26 Case Description: The case concerns the discriminatory refusal to allow the applicants IDPs to participate in election in 2015. In particular in 2014 2015 after the annexation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59595