Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 161 - 180 of 379
KINGSLEY v. the United Kingdom
KINGSLEY v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Gaming Board which revoked the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2246
KIRILOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
KIRILOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 09/09/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure to provide compensation through property in forms of flats or garages for expropriations in the 1980s or early 1990s in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3781
KIRINCIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia
KIRINCIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 30/10/2020 00:00:00 12/11/2020 14:39:13 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to a fair trial due to excessively lengthy civil proceedings from 2000 onwards violations of Article 6 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56279
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants torture or other forms of ill treatment by police agents during their arrest questioning transfer to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6582
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KOMANICKY v. Slovakia
KOMANICKY v. Slovakia SVK 04/09/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of an appeal court s decision to proceed with a case in the absence of the party EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7819
KOMISSAROV v. the Czech Republic
KOMISSAROV v. the Czech Republic CZE 03/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns excessive length of the applicant s detention pending extradition lasting in 2016 2017 for eighteen months as a result of delays in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60317
KONOVALOVA v. Russia
KONOVALOVA v. Russia RUS 16/02/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful presence of medical students during the birth of the applicant s child resulting from the lack of sufficient procedural safeguards in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27896
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 17/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of police compliance with their duty of diligence on account of their failure to preventively confiscate a gun from a student whose internet EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56529
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KRAYEVA v. Ukraine
KRAYEVA v. Ukraine UKR 13/04/2022 00:00:00 14/06/2022 10:06:23 Case Description: The case concerns the imposition of a disproportionate fine in an amount equal to the value of the imported goods on a customs clearance officer for a breach of customs EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60569
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland POL 02/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive use of force by the Police during the applicants arrest in February 2015 and ineffective investigation in the circumstances of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59191
KUKSA v. Russia
KUKSA v. Russia RUS 15/09/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure or serious delay by the State in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions awarding housing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14120
KUMMER v. the Czech Republic
KUMMER v. the Czech Republic CZE 25/10/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Degrading treatment in police custody due to unjustified use of restraints lack of effective investigations thereof Status of Execution: The just satisfaction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6436
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
KURLOWICZ v. Poland
KURLOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/09/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of this group concern violations of the right to freedom of expression Article 10 due to the applicants politicians journalists or editors criminal conviction to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20608
KURTI v. Greece
KURTI v. Greece GRC 29/12/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:33:21 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to lack of sufficient reasoning in a domestic court decision rejecting the applicant s request for compensation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-21676
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213