Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 34
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GORDIYENKO v. Ukraine
GORDIYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 16/01/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s ill treatment by security police officers in a local court in September 2010 and the lack of effective investigation in this regard EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32277
GRABCHUK v. Ukraine
GRABCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 21/12/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disrespect of the presumption of innocence due to the prosecution service s and domestic court s wording of their decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26170
INTERSPLAV v. Ukraine
INTERSPLAV v. Ukraine UKR 23/05/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference on account of systematic delays from 1998 onwards in payment of VAT refunds and of compensation for the delays EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31332
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine UKR 15/08/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31569
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine (no. 2)
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 11/09/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom and inhuman conditions of the applicant s detention during the hearing. Article 3 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32287
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MAMMADOV (JALALOGLU) v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADOV JALALOGLU v. Azerbaijan AZE 11/04/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These groups of cases concern mainly the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin or their ill treatment allegedly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1759
MELNIK v. Ukraine
MELNIK v. Ukraine UKR 28/06/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31318
MERIT v. Ukraine
MERIT v. Ukraine UKR 30/06/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31316
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 17/03/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These groups of cases concern mainly the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin or their ill treatment allegedly imputable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1711
MIKHAYLYUK AND PETROV v. Ukraine
MIKHAYLYUK AND PETROV v. Ukraine UKR 10/03/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private life in particular correspondence: Unlawful interception of correspondence by prison administration. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31090
MURADOVA v. Azerbaijan
MURADOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 02/07/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These groups of cases concern mainly the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin or their ill treatment allegedly imputable to law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1761
NAYDYON v. Ukraine
NAYDYON v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to provide prisoners with effective access to the documents from their case files needed to substantiate their applications before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31118