Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 261 - 280 of 352
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
RADCHIKOV v. Russia
RADCHIKOV v. Russia RUS 12/11/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty in criminal proceedings due to the quashing of final judicial decisions by means of supervisory EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13563
RAGUZ v. Croatia
RAGUZ v. Croatia HRV 10/02/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice / right to marry: Excessive length of civil including divorce and paternity proceedings and interference with the right to marry EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10081
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria AUT 28/04/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Excessive length of civil and criminal administrative proceedings and lack of effective remedy thereof Status of Execution: The Austrian administrative court system has EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1109
RAMIREZ SANCHEZ v. France
RAMIREZ SANCHEZ v. France FRA 04/07/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Absence of an effective remedy to contest the measures extending the solitary confinement Article 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33213
RAVON AND OTHERS v. France
RAVON AND OTHERS v. France FRA 21/05/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inability to challenge the lawfulness of the house searches and seizures to which they had been subjected in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33031
RENOLDE v. France
RENOLDE v. France FRA 16/01/2009 00:00:00 13/10/2016 09:33:56 Case Description: Right to life and protection against torture of mentally disturbed prisoners: Failure of authorities to protect the right to life and/or against inhuman and degrading EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-21
RIBIC v. Croatia
RIBIC v. Croatia HRV 02/07/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of authorities to enforce a parent s contact rights with his child. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10227
RICHARD ANDERSON v. the United Kingdom
RICHARD ANDERSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 09/05/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before the Scottish Courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2800
ROMET v. the Netherlands
ROMET v. the Netherlands NLD 14/05/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Interference with the right to respect for private life due to authorities failure to invalidate the applicant s stolen driving licence when reported leading to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4559
RONALD VERMEULEN v. Belgium
RONALD VERMEULEN v. Belgium BEL 17/10/2018 00:00:00 05/11/2018 16:01:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court resulting from the Conseil d tat s dismissal of the applicant s appeal due to its failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50711
ROOMAN v. Belgium
ROOMAN v. Belgium BEL 31/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:53:15 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of rights in detention: Failure to ensure a dangerous detainee s appropriate psychiatric care in a social protection facility due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51349
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
S.B. v. Romania
S.B. v. Romania ROU 23/12/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:23:17 Case Description: Protection of private life: Lack of opportunity to establish whether the applicant s dental treatment had constituted medical negligence and to obtain appropriate redress as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14219
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the recalculation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54303
SAAREKALLAS OU v. Estonia
SAAREKALLAS OU v. Estonia EST 08/02/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Excessively lengthy civil and administrative proceedings lack of an effective remedy Status of Execution: The authorities have indicated that the problem of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3079
SAGGIO v. Italy
SAGGIO v. Italy ITA 25/01/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy: Absence of an effective remedy to claim sums due to the applicant or to contest the action of the liquidators of the company of which he was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43163
SAMAT v. Turkey
SAMAT v. Turkey TUR 22/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial due to the lack of respect of the principle of legal certainty in proceedings concerning forest boundaries brought by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55541
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SANCHEZ CARDENAS v. Norway
SANCHEZ CARDENAS v. Norway NOR 04/01/2008 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate und unjustified interference due to suspicions expressed in a court decision on the applicant s visiting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-189