Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 24
A. AND B. v. Montenegro
A. AND B. v. Montenegro MNE 05/06/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:36:39 Case Description: Unlawful interference with possessions: The applicants foreign currency savings have never been registered and converted into the public debt contrary to the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11152
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
ANONYMOS TOURISTIKI ETAIRIA XENODOCHEIA KRITIS v. Greece
ANONYMOS TOURISTIKI ETAIRIA XENODOCHEIA KRITIS v. Greece GRC 21/05/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Interference with the company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions: failure of the Supreme Administrative Council to take EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22352
BORA v. Turkey
BORA v. Turkey TUR 09/05/2010 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Interference with right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Failure by domestic authorities to enforce a final judgment and stay of execution order of the Administrative Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5610
BUGAJNY AND OTHERS v. Poland
BUGAJNY AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 01/03/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Violation of the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions: refusal of the authorities in 2000 to expropriate the applicants land which was used for roads EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20602
CZAJKOWSKA AND OTHERS v. Poland
CZAJKOWSKA AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 13/10/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Excessive length of administrative proceedings concerning compensation for nationalized property violation of Article 6 1 and infringement of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20598
FELDMAN AND SLOVYANSKYY BANK v. Ukraine
FELDMAN AND SLOVYANSKYY BANK v. Ukraine UKR 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right of access to a court because the applicant a Ukrainian bank was not able to challenge before the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49603
FERNANDEZ AND OTHERS v. France
FERNANDEZ AND OTHERS v. France FRA 21/04/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:36:48 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Failure to enforce expulsion measures ordered by courts in respect of land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33337
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
GYRLYAN v. Russia
GYRLYAN v. Russia RUS 09/01/2019 00:00:00 27/02/2019 14:15:25 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of confiscation of his lawfully obtained cash imposed as an obligatory sanction for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51641
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right of the applicant bank to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions on account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39457
KECECIOGLU v. Turkey
KECECIOGLU v. Turkey TUR 08/07/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Failure by administrative authorities to put the expropriated property to the declared use of expropriation and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5598
KHACHATRYAN v. Armenia
KHACHATRYAN v. Armenia ARM 01/03/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Non enforcement of a final domestic judgment ordering a private company whose majority shareholder was the State to pay amounts to the applicants for salary arrears EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-415
KHRISTOV v. Ukraine
KHRISTOV v. Ukraine UKR 05/06/2009 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:02:34 Case Description: Quashing of a final judgment by way of extraordinary review and interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions as a result: Unfair administrative proceedings in a case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26444
KILIC v. Turkey
KILIC v. Turkey TUR 25/10/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the right to a fair trial and/or of the right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions in certain cases on account of the failure by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37276
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
LIMAN-IS SENDIKASI (NO 1) v. Turkey
LIMAN IS SENDIKASI NO 1 v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 09/02/2018 16:41:55 Case Description: The case of Liman Is 29608/05 concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national authorities to enforce final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37182
NATIONAL MOVEMENT EKOGLASNOST v. Bulgaria
NATIONAL MOVEMENT EKOGLASNOST v. Bulgaria BGR 15/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns an infringement of the applicant association s right to peaceful of its possessions due to an order to pay lawyer s fees in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57167
PRAVEDNAYA v. Russia
PRAVEDNAYA v. Russia RUS 30/03/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the quashing of final court decisions delivered in the applicants favour on account of newly discovered circumstances these most often being EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13583