Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8
A.C. v. France
A.C. v. France FRA 10/08/1995 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before a court of appeal which had sentenced the applicant in absentia and where his lawyer was not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31433
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/04/2021 00:00:00 23/04/2021 09:38:23 Case Description: These cases concern unjustified judicial refusals in 2013 and 2014 to register two Orthodox churches on the ground that they had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57381
DOLENEC v. Croatia
DOLENEC v. Croatia HRV 26/02/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / access to and effective functioning of justice: Failure of authorities to conduct an effective investigation into allegations of ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10289
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
POITRIMOL v. France
POITRIMOL v. France FRA 23/11/1993 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court and thus of a fair trial on account of the declaration of inadmissibility ipso jure of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32907
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia LVA 30/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to covert interception in of telephone conversations in the framework of the criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12674
VANYAN v. Russia
VANYAN v. Russia RUS 15/03/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concern the incitement to commit a crime drug dealing or bribe taking in the course of covert police operations in the absence of a clear and foreseeable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13543