Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ELAWA v. Turkey
ELAWA v. Turkey TUR 20/06/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal proceedings from 30 May 2001 2 March 2006 four years and nine months at two levels of jurisdiction violation of Article 6 1 and lack of access to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37274
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KATRAMI v. Greece
KATRAMI v. Greece GRC 06/03/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to the criminal convictions imposed on them for insult Article 361 Criminal Code defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15699
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 01/07/2014 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before civil courts and administrative bodies between 1996 and 2021. The European Court criticised in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-261
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MARTYNENKO v. Ukraine
MARTYNENKO v. Ukraine UKR 24/02/2022 00:00:00 25/02/2022 11:14:30 Case Description: The case concerns the conviction of the applicant in 2012 on a drug dealing charge for which the prosecutor had admitted to lack evidence. After the applicant s conviction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59735
SHCHOKIN v. Ukraine
SHCHOKIN v. Ukraine UKR 03/01/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the death of the applicant s son in a penitentiary colony in October 2000 his ill treatment before his death by co prisoners and probably by a prison guard EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31359
SOLCAN v. Romania
SOLCAN v. Romania ROU 08/01/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 09:50:51 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal to allow the applicant who is confined in a psychiatric facility as a security measure to attend her mother s funeral in 2013 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54705
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569