Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 21
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
BERARU v. Romania
BERARU v. Romania ROU 08/09/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to an irregularity in the composition of the panel of the first instance court the limited access of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13312
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania LTU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the State Border Guard Service to allow the applicants to submit asylum applications at border check points and their return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51869
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 14/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the Convention on account of refusals of border guards to receive asylum application from the applicants on various occasions between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56535
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MATCZAK v. Poland
MATCZAK v. Poland POL 23/02/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive overall length of detention on remand due to overlapping periods in two parallel criminal cases. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17646
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
SALDUZ v. Turkey
SALDUZ v. Turkey TUR 27/11/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a lawyer during questioning at police stations and use of the statements made as evidence in proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37270
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 21/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: The case concerns the collective expulsion by Italy to Greece of four migrants intercepted as stowaways on ferries arriving in the port of Ancona between January EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15559
SOLCAN v. Romania
SOLCAN v. Romania ROU 08/01/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 09:50:51 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal to allow the applicant who is confined in a psychiatric facility as a security measure to attend her mother s funeral in 2013 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54705
TROSIN v. Ukraine
TROSIN v. Ukraine UKR 23/05/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / discrimination / cooperation with ECtHR: Disproportionate interference due to restrictions of family visits in prison as regards their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31624
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right of access to court on account of the refusal by the domestic courts in 2005 and 2007 respectively to examine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6844
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569