Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
GARTUKAYEV v. Russia
GARTUKAYEV v. Russia RUS 13/03/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern unlawful restrictions of the applicants right to liberty of movement in that in 1999 and 2000 they had not been permitted on a single occasion to enter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13599
GOGGINS v. the United Kingdom
GOGGINS v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Interference with private and family life: Collection and retention of their DNA samples fingerprints and associated data despite either being acquitted of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2874
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KARPYUK AND LYAKHOVYCH v. Ukraine
KARPYUK AND LYAKHOVYCH v. Ukraine UKR 06/01/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the conviction of three of the applicants the members of an opposition nationalistic movement to disproportionately long prison sentences up EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31600
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KILAVUZ v. Turkey
KILAVUZ v. Turkey TUR 21/01/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation on account of the failure of the prison authorities in their obligation to protect the right to life of the applicant s son who committed suicide EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37421
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 01/07/2014 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before civil courts and administrative bodies between 1996 and 2021. The European Court criticised in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-261
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania LTU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the State Border Guard Service to allow the applicants to submit asylum applications at border check points and their return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51869
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 14/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the Convention on account of refusals of border guards to receive asylum application from the applicants on various occasions between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56535
OMER GUNER v. Turkey
OMER GUNER v. Turkey TUR 04/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the procedural safeguards in force at the time of the event to prevent the use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50951
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 21/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: The case concerns the collective expulsion by Italy to Greece of four migrants intercepted as stowaways on ferries arriving in the port of Ancona between January EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15559
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right of access to court on account of the refusal by the domestic courts in 2005 and 2007 respectively to examine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6844
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569