Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 101 - 120 of 203
KRYVITSKA AND KRYVITSKYY v. Ukraine
KRYVITSKA AND KRYVITSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 02/03/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to respect for home as the applicants having been tenants were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31573
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
KWIECIEN v. Poland
KWIECIEN v. Poland POL 09/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to regional court s order in defamation proceedings under the Law on Local Elections to publish in a local newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18033
L.M. v. Slovenia
L.M. v. Slovenia SVN 12/09/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of private life: Unlawful involuntary confinement in the closed wards of the Idrija and Ljubljana Psychiatric Hospitals and the open ward EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7414
LASZKIEWICZ v. Poland
LASZKIEWICZ v. Poland POL 15/04/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to ensure equality of arms and the adversarial principle due to impossibility to adequately challenge motions for prolongation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18589
LIAKOPOULOU v. Greece
LIAKOPOULOU v. Greece GRC 23/10/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to an excessively formalistic approach which had prevented the applicants from having the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22350
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 01/07/2014 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before civil courts and administrative bodies between 1996 and 2021. The European Court criticised in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-261
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania LTU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the State Border Guard Service to allow the applicants to submit asylum applications at border check points and their return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51869
M.A.K. v. the United Kingdom
M.A.K. v. the United Kingdom GBR 23/06/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life and effective remedy: Medical treatment of a child in a public hospital in particular conducting tests without parental consent prevention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2947
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 14/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the Convention on account of refusals of border guards to receive asylum application from the applicants on various occasions between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56535
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. Azerbaijan
MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. Azerbaijan AZE 18/03/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of expression of the applicant journalists in all cases due to in particular to the unjustified use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1709
MAJEWSKI v. Poland
MAJEWSKI v. Poland POL 11/01/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20588
MAMMADOV (JALALOGLU) v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADOV JALALOGLU v. Azerbaijan AZE 11/04/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These groups of cases concern mainly the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin or their ill treatment allegedly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1759
MARTYNENKO v. Ukraine
MARTYNENKO v. Ukraine UKR 24/02/2022 00:00:00 25/02/2022 11:14:30 Case Description: The case concerns the conviction of the applicant in 2012 on a drug dealing charge for which the prosecutor had admitted to lack evidence. After the applicant s conviction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59735
MATEESCU v. Romania
MATEESCU v. Romania ROU 14/04/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to refusal of the Bucharest Bar to allow the applicant to practice simultaneously as a doctor and lawyer on the basis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13187
MATYTSINA v. Russia
MATYTSINA v. Russia RUS 27/06/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to equality of arms in criminal proceedings on account of the unfair handling of expert evidence which put the defence at a significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14052
MEGHELES AND POPA v. Romania
MEGHELES AND POPA v. Romania ROU 14/01/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Interference with property rights and lack of a fair trial: on account of the Supreme Court s annulment of final court decisions delivered at first instance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16891