Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 43
AMER v. Turkey
AMER v. Turkey TUR 06/07/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal proceedings from 29 May 2001 2 March 2006 four years and 9 months for two levels of jurisdiction violation of Article 6 1 and infringement of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37140
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/12/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to marry: Prohibition of marriage between a father in law and daughter in law by legislation unless both their former spouses had die. Article 12 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2850
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
DI TRIZIO v. Switzerland
DI TRIZIO v. Switzerland CHE 04/07/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Discrimination: refusal of the authorities based on the so called combined method of calculation to continue granting disability allowance to a mother when she decided EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5854
ELAWA v. Turkey
ELAWA v. Turkey TUR 20/06/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal proceedings from 30 May 2001 2 March 2006 four years and nine months at two levels of jurisdiction violation of Article 6 1 and lack of access to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37274
FEILAZOO v. Malta
FEILAZOO v. Malta MLT 11/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns the inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention pending deportation in the periods from 16 to 23 May 2019 and from 15 September 2019 to 13 November EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57955
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the failure by the State to discharge its positive obligation to protect lives in the context of a large scale flood in the area around the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14122
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia RUS 22/03/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the discrimination of the applicants military serviceman and police officers on account of different conditions for parental leave based on their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13956
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: For the situation with the Jehovah s Witnesses in the Russian Federation see the separate notes in the cases Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and Others and Krupko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13635
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148