Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 561 - 580 of 693
SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. Turkey (no. 2)
SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 22/12/2020 00:00:00 18/01/2021 11:11:14 Case Description: The Selahattin Demirta No. 2 case concerns the arrest and pre trial detention of and criminal proceedings against the applicant a member of the National EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56539
SELIN ASLI OZTURK v. Turkey
SELIN ASLI OZTURK v. Turkey TUR 13/01/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Protection of property. Access to and efficient functioning of justice: inability to apply for recognition of the applicant s deceased father s divorce decree issued EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37280
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the unlawful interference with the applicants right to respect for their correspondence with various official bodies and institutions both while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31112
SHAHANOV AND PALFREEMAN v. Bulgaria
SHAHANOV AND PALFREEMAN v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to disciplinary punishment of prisoners respectively to ten days of solitary confinement or three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39555
SHANNON v. the United Kingdom
SHANNON v. the United Kingdom GBR 04/01/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right no to incriminate oneself due to the applicant s conviction in 1999 of the offence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2860
SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/12/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to property Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 due to an interference with their shareholding in a limited liability EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3857
SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 21/04/2021 00:00:00 11/05/2021 15:56:40 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns multiple violations during the Maidan protests in Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine in 2013 2014 either by State or by non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57585
SHOYGO v. Ukraine
SHOYGO v. Ukraine UKR 30/09/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the lawfulness of detention pending deportation of the applicant who at the time lacked identity documents and the failure of the authorities to pursue the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58533
SHPAKOVSKIY v. Russia
SHPAKOVSKIY v. Russia RUS 07/10/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Non enforcement of domestic judgments ordering authorities to provide the applicants with flats EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14092
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece GRC 25/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: These cases concern ill treatment by law enforcement agents substantive violation of Article 3 in Konstantinopoulos and Others No. 2 and the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49397
SIEMASZKO v. Poland
SIEMASZKO v. Poland POL 06/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: An obligation between 2000 and 2012 to deposit funds to be available to the applicants on their release from prison on the savings account with interest rates well below the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46301
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande ISL 30/05/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Absence of a possibility for the applicant company to have the imposition of a fine by the labour court reviewed. Article 2 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57
SIKIC v. Croatia
SIKIC v. Croatia HRV 15/10/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before the Constitutional Court. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12022
SILIH v. Slovenia
SILIH v. Slovenia SVN 09/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Right to life: Excessively lengthy criminal and civil proceedings due to delays and frequent changes of judges concerning a relative s death caused by alleged medical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7472
SIMSEK v. Turkey
SIMSEK v. Turkey TUR 30/07/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention without any judicial review and impossibility to challenge speedily the lawfulness of the applicant s detention as he had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28579
SINNESAEL v. Greece
SINNESAEL v. Greece GRC 25/11/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unfair proceedings for compensation following acquittal for detention on remand. Article 5 5 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22160
SIRVINSKAS v. Lithuania
SIRVINSKAS v. Lithuania LTU 23/10/2019 00:00:00 06/11/2019 17:49:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unfairness of the domestic courts decision making process in a divorce case with regard to the application of interim measures and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54135
SIRYK v. Ukraine
SIRYK v. Ukraine UKR 30/06/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to defamation proceedings brought against the applicant following a letter she addressed to the tax authorities in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32056
SISMANIDIS v. Greece
SISMANIDIS v. Greece GRC 09/09/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:57:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and ne bis in idem: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the administrative court adjudicating the lawfulness of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15383
SISSANIS v. Romania
SISSANIS v. Romania ROU 25/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Unlawful or disproportionate prohibition to leave the country or the city in the framework of criminal proceedings. Article 2 2 of Protocol No. 4 Access EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16331