Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 601 - 620 of 693
SUKHANOV AND ILCHENKO v. Ukraine
SUKHANOV AND ILCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern the interference with the applicants rights under Article 1 of Protocol No.1 legitimate expectation resulting from the failure of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32283
SUKRAN AYDIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
SUKRAN AYDIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference on account of the applicants conviction for having spoken Kurdish during election campaigns in 2002 2004 and 2007 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37340
SULCAS v. Lithuania
SULCAS v. Lithuania LTU 05/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings lack of an effective remedy Status of Execution: As far as the effective domestic compensatory remedy with regard to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4267
SUSO MUSA v. Malta
SUSO MUSA v. Malta MLT 09/12/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and against ill treatment: Arbitrary detention of asylum seekers without effective and speedy remedy under domestic law to challenge the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4127
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31302
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/06/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of criminal Stoine Hristov no. 2 and civil Svetlozar Petrov proceedings violations of Articles 6 1 1 before the most EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3731
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia RUS 17/07/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly the applicants degrading treatment violations of Article 3 in different periods from 2007 to 2017 on account of their confinement in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14144
SVIPSTA v. Latvia
SVIPSTA v. Latvia LVA 09/06/2006 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12622
SVYATO-MYKHAYLIVSKA PARAFIYA v. Ukraine
SVYATO MYKHAYLIVSKA PARAFIYA v. Ukraine UKR 14/09/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of association: Unjustified interference on account of the authorities refusal to register changes and amendments to the applicant religious EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31320
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary HUN 06/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group concerns the violation of the applicants right to respect for private and family life and for correspondence on account of the Hungarian legislation on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10745
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom GBR 02/09/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of correspondence in detention: Unjustified monitoring by prison authorities of medical correspondence between the applicant a convicted prisoner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2804
T. v. the United Kingdom
T. v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/12/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Denial of a fair trial due to the applicants inability minors aged 10 at the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2452
TANASE v. the Republic of Moldova
TANASE v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 27/04/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 11:48:46 Case Description: Electoral rights: Legislative ban imposed on nationals with dual or multiple nationalities to stand as candidate in parliamentary elections Article 3 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7610
TATO MARINHO DOS SANTOS COSTA ALVES DOS SANTOS AND FIGUEIREDO v. Portugal
TATO MARINHO DOS SANTOS COSTA ALVES DOS SANTOS AND FIGUEIREDO v. Portugal PRT 21/09/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:51:34 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfairness of disciplinary proceedings against judges on account of the insufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8813
TCHANKOTADZE v. Georgia
TCHANKOTADZE v. Georgia GEO 12/09/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful detention on remand of the chairperson of the Civil Aviation Agency of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5820
THE ARGES COLLEGE OF LEGAL ADVISERS v. Romania
THE ARGES COLLEGE OF LEGAL ADVISERS v. Romania ROU 08/06/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of association: Dismissal of the request for registration as a professional association of legal advisers on grounds that some provisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16827
TIERCE, MARRA AND GABRIELLI v. San Marino
TIERCE MARRA AND GABRIELLI v. San Marino SMR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:41:24 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of impartiality of the judge on the ground of his double EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11186
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 15:06:12 Case Description: These cases concern a structural problem highlighted by the European Court applying the pilot judgment procedure of inhuman and degrading treatment caused by the poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52617
TONSBERGS BLAD AS AND HAUKOM v. Norway
TONSBERGS BLAD AS AND HAUKOM v. Norway NOR 01/06/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation of a newspaper company and its editor in chief following the publication of an article about seaside EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-191