Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 661 - 680 of 693
VOLODINA v. Russia
VOLODINA v. Russia RUS 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54227
VOLODINA v. Russia (no. 2)
VOLODINA v. Russia no. 2 RUS 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59319
VRONCHENKO v. Estonia
VRONCHENKO v. Estonia EST 18/10/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:50:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure in criminal proceedings resulting in convictions for sexual abuse of a child to grant the accused the opportunity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3049
VROUNTOU v. Cyprus
VROUNTOU v. Cyprus CYP 13/01/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Protection of property and discrimination: Refusal to grant the applicant a refugee card giving access to housing assistance due to her lacking qualification as displaced EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3205
VUJOVIC AND LIPA D.O.O. v. Montenegro
VUJOVIC AND LIPA D.O.O. v. Montenegro MNE 02/07/2018 00:00:00 26/07/2018 17:22:16 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate hindrance of access to court due to the Court of Appeal s refusal to examine a company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49909
WELLER v. Hungary
WELLER v. Hungary HUN 30/06/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection of privation and family life and discrimination: Refusal of maternity benefits because the mother of the children had not been eligible on account of her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11342
WESSELS-BERGERVOET v. the Netherlands
WESSELS BERGERVOET v. the Netherlands NLD 04/09/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of property and discrimination on the ground of gender: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant due to a reduction of her old age pension EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4483
WETTSTEIN v. Switzerland
WETTSTEIN v. Switzerland CHE 21/03/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the lack of impartiality of the cantonal administrative court as two part time judges had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4682
WIKTORKO v. Poland
WIKTORKO v. Poland POL 30/06/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Ill treatment in a sobering up centre and lack of an effective investigation Status of Execution: Reopening of investigation impossible due to prescription. In 2001 the 1982 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18273
WILLE v. Liechtenstein
WILLE v. Liechtenstein LIE 28/10/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:30:30 Case Description: Les notes ne sont disponibles qu en anglais. Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just satisfaction for non pecuniary damage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-79
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland POL 05/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the criminal conviction of a chief editor and co owner of a local newspaper for the publication of an interview EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20600
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.F. v. Turkey
Y.F. v. Turkey TUR 22/10/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to fact that the applicant s wife was forced to undergo a gynaecological examination after having been taken into police EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5474
Y v. Norway
Y v. Norway NOR 11/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disrespect of the presumption of innocence on account of judicial acts implying suspicion of criminal guilt in compensation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-185
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YAKUSHEV v. Ukraine
YAKUSHEV v. Ukraine UKR 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the arbitrary dismissal by the domestic courts of the applicants claims regarding their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50899
YILMAZ AND KILIC v. Turkey
YILMAZ AND KILIC v. Turkey TUR 17/10/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction for having participated in a demonstration to protest against the arrest of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30398
YOH-EKALE MWANJE v. Belgium
YOH EKALE MWANJE v. Belgium BEL 20/03/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection against inhuman treatment against expulsion and lack of effective remedy: Inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by a Cameroonian national an illegal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1543