Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 15 of 15
BRUCZYNSKI v. Poland
BRUCZYNSKI v. Poland POL 04/02/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand without relevant and sufficient grounds and lack of enforceable right to compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18557
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
HARKMANN v. Estonia
HARKMANN v. Estonia EST 11/10/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Denial of the applicants right to be brought promptly before a judge following arrest and lack of an enforceable right to compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3073
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
KIRAKOSYAN v. Armenia
KIRAKOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 04/05/2009 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Poor conditions of administrative detention without adequate time and facilities to prepare any defence and without any right of appeal. Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-395
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
LOLOVA-KARADZHOVA v. Bulgaria
LOLOVA KARADZHOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 27/06/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Disproportionate detention ordered by a judge and aimed at ensuring an accused person s presence before a criminal court as well EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3900
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/09/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Automatic pre trial detention under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and the lack of availability of an enforceable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2568
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine UKR 30/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:26:32 Case Description: The Shvydka case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to her conviction and sentence to ten days detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37062
STOICHKOV v. Bulgaria
STOICHKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 24/06/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of judicial review of the lawfulness of the applicants detentions after conviction allowing to address their allegations that the execution of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3805