Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
AZAS v. Greece
AZAS v. Greece GRC 21/05/2003 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Several procedural shortcomings or relating to compensation in the context of land expropriation proceedings. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22222
BUDCHENKO v. Ukraine
BUDCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 24/07/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of property: State s prolonged failure to secure the exemption from payment for electricity and gas to which a former mine worker in a State enterprise was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31844
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
CAKAREVIC v. Croatia
CAKAREVIC v. Croatia HRV 26/07/2018 00:00:00 19/10/2018 11:50:30 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Excessive burden on the applicants due to certain requirements of reimbursement including statutory interest payments imposed on them in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50581
CORNWELL v. the United Kingdom
CORNWELL v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2566
DOWNIE v. the United Kingdom
DOWNIE v. the United Kingdom GBR 21/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2584
FIELDING v. the United Kingdom
FIELDING v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/01/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2570
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/04/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: This group concerns the failure within the Turkish legal framework to grant legal recognition to the Alevi faith 1 thus depriving its followers of the right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37402
KUNIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
KUNIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 14/02/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of non enforcement of domestic judgments ordering four EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49047
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
LEARY v. the United Kingdom
LEARY v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2586
LOFFELMAN v. the United Kingdom
LOFFELMAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/03/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2622
MARTINOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MARTINOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 25/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: This group of four cases concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial and peaceful protection of their property on account of the delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50415
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
RICE v. the United Kingdom
RICE v. the United Kingdom GBR 01/10/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex on the ground that social benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2760
SAWDEN v. the United Kingdom
SAWDEN v. the United Kingdom GBR 12/03/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2590
STATILEO v. Croatia
STATILEO v. Croatia HRV 10/10/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property between 1997 and 2015 on account of statutory limitations on the use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12093
STEFEK v. Croatia
STEFEK v. Croatia HRV 02/06/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive costs of civil proceedings which the applicant was ordered to pay by the Osijek County Court in February 2017 as a result of a civil action the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60405