Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 381 - 400 of 526
PASCALI AND CONTE v. Italy
PASCALI AND CONTE v. Italy ITA 05/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before the Court of Audit. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42891
PASQUINI v. San Marino (no. 2)
PASQUINI v. San Marino no. 2 SMR 08/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to the presumption of innocence. Even though the criminal proceedings against the applicant on charges of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57159
PASSADORO v. Italy
PASSADORO v. Italy ITA 02/11/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42885
PAWLINKOWSKA v. Poland
PAWLINKOWSKA v. Poland POL 08/07/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of impartiality of the courts hearing them. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17953
PECNIK ALENKA v. Slovenia
PECNIK ALENKA v. Slovenia SVN 27/12/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of impartiality of a tribunal in proceedings resulting in a lawyer s conviction for contempt of court by a judge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7136
PENNA v. Italy
PENNA v. Italy ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42859
PERDIGAO v. Portugal
PERDIGAO v. Portugal PRT 16/11/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of property: Court fees in proceedings relating to the expropriation of a building were higher than the amount awarded to the owners in compensation for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9689
PESONI v. Italy
PESONI v. Italy ITA 05/10/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43067
PESSINO v. France
PESSINO v. France FRA 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Ne bis in idem: Inability to foresee the Court of Cassation s departure from precedent case law and to realise that the acts committed continuation of construction work in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33257
PETERSEN v. Denmark
PETERSEN v. Denmark DNK 16/02/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:02:09 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing before and independent tribunal in proceedings concerning a parking fine as the bailiff s court had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3265
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
PETROTOS v. Greece
PETROTOS v. Greece GRC 29/02/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Non enforcement of two judicial decisions ordering a local water supply company to pay compensation for having deprived the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22192
PETSCHAR v. Austria
PETSCHAR v. Austria AUT 17/04/2003 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-563
PFLEGER v. Austria
PFLEGER v. Austria AUT 04/07/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing and of a public delivery of the decisions in land consolidation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-813
PITSILLOS v. Cyprus
PITSILLOS v. Cyprus CYP 28/03/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil compensation proceedings for the expropriation of the applicant s land. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1976
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia ARM 12/09/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Lack of effective remedy under Armenian law to apply for compensation for the non pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant in connection with his ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-459
POGORYELOV v. Ukraine
POGORYELOV v. Ukraine UKR 13/10/2022 00:00:00 18/10/2022 14:54:25 Case Description: The case concerns the two day arbitrary psychiatric detention of the applicant in 2014 who suffered from alleged mental health issues without any reasonable indication of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61469
POLAT v. Turkey
POLAT v. Turkey TUR 05/12/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28699
POLIZZI v. Italy
POLIZZI v. Italy ITA 12/10/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of labour court proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42455
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland POL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Since 1987 the applicants have been prevented from developing their plot of land following a decision to classify it as a historic monument on the grounds that a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20604