Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ABDILLA v. Malta
ABDILLA v. Malta MLT 17/10/2018 00:00:00 05/11/2018 16:01:55 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of an effective remedy to enable the applicant to challenge the conditions of his detention in the Corradino Correctional Facility where he has been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50749
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3137
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 24/09/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:11:36 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3435
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan AZE 19/07/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The seven remaining applicants in this group the former Ilgar Mammadov group are human rights defenders civil society activists and a journalist. They were all the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50875
MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. Lithuania
MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. Lithuania LTU 02/05/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: These cases concern the poor conditions of detention in long term detention facilities between 2008 and the date of the judgments violation of Article 3 . The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4369
MIROSLAVA TODOROVA v. Bulgaria
MIROSLAVA TODOROVA v. Bulgaria BGR 19/01/2022 00:00:00 04/02/2022 11:30:26 Case Description: The case concerns disciplinary proceedings and sanctions in 2011 2015 imposed by the Supreme Judicial Council the SJC against the applicant a judge who in her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59583
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/09/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Automatic pre trial detention under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and the lack of availability of an enforceable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2568
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459