Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
KARZHEV v. Bulgaria
KARZHEV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to a former prosecutor s conviction for insult of two acting prosecutors in an interview given in a national daily EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47643
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary HUN 13/10/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants life sentences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10897
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 16/08/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the domestic courts to examine the proportionality of the interference with the applicants property rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32248
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
STOINE HRISTOV v. Bulgaria (II)
STOINE HRISTOV v. Bulgaria II BGR 16/01/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of criminal Stoine Hristov no. 2 and civil Svetlozar Petrov proceedings violations of Articles 6 1 1 before the most EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3703
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/06/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of criminal Stoine Hristov no. 2 and civil Svetlozar Petrov proceedings violations of Articles 6 1 1 before the most EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3731
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569