Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
M. G. C. v. Romania
M. G. C. v. Romania ROU 15/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Judgments: M.G.C. v. Romania No. 61495/11 final on 15/06/2016 I.C. v. Romania No. 36934/08 final on 24/08/2016 These cases concern breaches of the State s positive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13219
MILJEVIC v. Croatia
MILJEVIC v. Croatia HRV 25/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to convictions imposed in 2009 2012 for defamation Article 200 of the Criminal Code EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56053
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
VOLODINA v. Russia
VOLODINA v. Russia RUS 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54227
VOLODINA v. Russia (no. 2)
VOLODINA v. Russia no. 2 RUS 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59319