Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 25
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
DAINELIENE v. Lithuania
DAINELIENE v. Lithuania LTU 16/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to carry out a fair and impartial consideration of an appeal on points of law against a ruling of embezzlement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50557
DERYAN v. Turkey
DERYAN v. Turkey TUR 21/10/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The cases in this group concern the failure of judicial authorities at all levels of jurisdiction to provide adequate reasoning in judicial decisions concerning civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37322
DZWONKOWSKI v. Poland
DZWONKOWSKI v. Poland POL 12/07/2007 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention/ right to life: Ill treatment inflicted by the police as well as in two cases death and unintentional killing by the police and lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39854
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: The cases mainly concern the deaths of the applicants next of kin as a result of unjustified and excessive force used by members of the security forces during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37076
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 15/01/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The majority of the cases in this group concern deaths torture ill treatment excessive use of force or lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3943
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania ROU 13/04/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:28:55 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s ill treatment on account of failure by the authorities to provide the applicant with food for about 10 hours in March 2010 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17609
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
PEEV v. Bulgaria
PEEV v. Bulgaria BGR 26/10/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The case of Peev concerns the unlawful search operated in the office of a civil servant and termination of his work contract in retaliation for a letter he had published in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3807
RECHTOVA v. the Czech Republic
RECHTOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/09/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to Constitutional Court due to its restrictive interpretation of the admissibility rules. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6392
REGALOVA v. the Czech Republic
REGALOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 03/10/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to Constitutional Court due to its restrictive interpretation of the admissibility rules. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6314
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744