Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 32
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY TUR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the application of urban planning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39509
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BARTOS v. Romania
BARTOS v. Romania ROU 20/10/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Quashing of final court decisions by the Supreme Court following an application for nullity lodged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16305
BENEDIK v. Slovenia
BENEDIK v. Slovenia SVN 24/07/2018 00:00:00 23/10/2018 17:25:37 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Arbitrary interference by the police on the basis of a law lacking clarity and sufficient safeguards to obtain and use without a court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50585
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3137
IRFAN TEMEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IRFAN TEMEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/06/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Right to education: Disciplinary proceedings against the applicants for having petitioned the university authorities to provide optional Kurdish language EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37272
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
KAYA AND SEYHAN v. Turkey
KAYA AND SEYHAN v. Turkey TUR 15/12/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This case concerns unjustified interference with the applicants right of freedom of association in that they were subjected to disciplinary proceedings and received a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37234
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KROMBACH v. France
KROMBACH v. France FRA 13/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Impossibility to be represented by a lawyer in absentia proceedings before assize courts according to the letter of Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32947
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 24/09/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:11:36 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3435
MAJEWSKI v. Poland
MAJEWSKI v. Poland POL 11/01/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20588
MIRAGALL ESCOLANO & OTHERS v. Spain
MIRAGALL ESCOLANO OTHERS v. Spain ESP 25/04/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts inflexible interpretation of provisions governing the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3473
MULLAI AND OTHERS v. Albania
MULLAI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 23/06/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Inability to obtain a conclusive judicial determination of the validity of a building EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-343
MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia
MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/12/2018 00:00:00 16/01/2019 17:03:19 Case Description: In the present cases the Court found various violations of Articles 3 5 6 11 and 13 of the Convention in the context of the dispersal by the authorities of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51167
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NYKANEN v. Finland
NYKANEN v. Finland FIN 20/08/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the right not to be punished twice as the applicants were convicted in both criminal and administrative taxation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6022