Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CIANETTI v. Italy
CIANETTI v. Italy ITA 10/11/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings for abuse of the applicant s position as a civil servant and forgery of documents as two judges who EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44009
DENISOVA AND MOISEYEVA v. Russia
DENISOVA AND MOISEYEVA v. Russia RUS 04/10/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the lack of a proper judicial review of the confiscation measures imposed on the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13757
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
FRASIK v. Poland
FRASIK v. Poland POL 05/04/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Right to marry lack of an effective remedy and protection of rights in detention: Disproportionate interference due to lack of restraint displayed by the national judge in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20590
JASINSKA v. Poland
JASINSKA v. Poland POL 01/09/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Failure to protect the life of a prisoner: deficiency in the prison system that allowed a first time prisoner who was mentally fragile to gather a lethal dose of psychotropic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18883
M. G. C. v. Romania
M. G. C. v. Romania ROU 15/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Judgments: M.G.C. v. Romania No. 61495/11 final on 15/06/2016 I.C. v. Romania No. 36934/08 final on 24/08/2016 These cases concern breaches of the State s positive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13219
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MURADYAN v. Armenia
MURADYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicants sons right to life during their military service as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46287
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to take operational measures in line with international standards to protect two minors who were prosecuted in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58063