Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
GHIURAU v. Romania
GHIURAU v. Romania ROU 29/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13121
GHULYAN v. Armenia
GHULYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:55:17 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Lack of impartiality of the tribunal due to the connection between the opposition counsel and the presiding judge in a job reinstatement claim created EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51381
GUNGOR v. Turkey
GUNGOR v. Turkey TUR 22/06/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns a procedural violation of the right to life and the right to an effective remedy on account of the lack of an effective investigation into the killing of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37132
KARACSONY AND OTHERS v. Hungary
KARACSONY AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 17/05/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of four cases concerns violations of the applicant parliamentarians freedom of expression at the material time all members of the opposition in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10967
MENCKEBERG v. the Netherlands
MENCKEBERG v. the Netherlands NLD 22/02/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Appeal Court resulting in the applicant s conviction to a four months prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4451
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
OZCAN v. Turkey
OZCAN v. Turkey TUR 10/07/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:43:11 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Non appearance of the applicants before a court in proceedings to challenge the lawfulness of their continued detention length of detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49939
PICHUGIN v. Russia
PICHUGIN v. Russia RUS 18/03/2013 00:00:00 07/11/2016 10:37:05 Case Description: These cases 1 concern violations of the applicant s right to liberty and to a fair trial in the context of two sets of criminal proceedings which ended with his conviction on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-23422
PICHUGIN v. Russia
PICHUGIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: These cases 1 concern violations of the applicant s right to liberty and to a fair trial in the context of two sets of criminal proceedings which ended with his conviction on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47013
SZANYI v. Hungary
SZANYI v. Hungary HUN 06/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of expression of the applicant at the material time member of the opposition in the Hungarian Parliament on account of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46353
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825