Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 92
A. v. Norway
A. v. Norway NOR 09/07/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private life: Domestic courts failure to protect the applicant s reputation due to the unfavourable outcome of a defamation suit that he brought against a newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-205
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
AEPI S.A. v. Greece
AEPI S.A. v. Greece GRC 11/07/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of excess to a court due to dismissals of appeals on points of law by the Court of Cassation as being out of time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22216
AGEYEVY v. Russia
AGEYEVY v. Russia RUS 09/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: 5 violations of the right to respect for private and family life Article 8 of the applicants a married couple in the context of events which resulted in the removal of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14030
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARLEWIN v. Sweden
ARLEWIN v. Sweden SWE 01/06/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:39:23 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the obligation under Article 6 of the Convention to provide the applicant with effective access to court to obtain protection against alleged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2062
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
AURELIAN OPREA v. Romania
AURELIAN OPREA v. Romania ROU 19/04/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Freedom of expression: disproportionate interference due to the substantial amount of civil damages the applicant was ordered to pay to the plaintiff in defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13401
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland ISL 10/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to convictions of the applicant journalists in civil defamation proceedings brought against them on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-71
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
CHEMODUROV v. Russia
CHEMODUROV v. Russia RUS 31/10/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violations of the right to freedom of expression of the applicants mainly journalists in civil defamation and criminal proceedings due notably to the lack of distinction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13597
DABROWSKI v. Poland
DABROWSKI v. Poland POL 19/03/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to conviction of a journalist for defamation in criminal proceedings for having published articles about the deputy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18437
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS-CASSO v. France
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS CASSO v. France FRA 12/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for public defamation of a deputy mayor during a municipal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33303
EGILL EINARSSON v. Iceland
EGILL EINARSSON v. Iceland ISL 07/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the dismissal of defamation proceedings brought by a public figure for the publication of a picture EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49139
FALZON v. Malta
FALZON v. Malta MLT 20/06/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction to pay damages for defamation of an MP in journalistic statements presented in a question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50015
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of expression violations of Article 10 of the applicant journalists due in particular in both cases to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1727
GAVRILOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova
GAVRILOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interferences by domestic courts on account of the applicants convictions for defamation or public protest without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6840
GAZETA UKRAINA-TSENTR v. Ukraine
GAZETA UKRAINA TSENTR v. Ukraine UKR 15/10/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unnecessary interference due to the condemnation of a newspaper company in defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31126