Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 75
ALEKSANDR ALEKSANDROV v. Russia
ALEKSANDR ALEKSANDROV v. Russia RUS 10/09/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: This case concerns the discriminatory treatment of the applicant in that the domestic courts which convicted him in 2005 denied him a non custodial sentence on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50261
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ALEKSIC v. Slovenia
ALEKSIC v. Slovenia SVN 19/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory refusal without objective and reasonable justification to grant the applicant an old age pension on the ground that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51491
ANAGNOSTAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece
ANAGNOSTAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 23/12/2021 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life due to the unreasonably delayed proceedings concerning in Anagnostakis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59399
AZIZ v. Cyprus
AZIZ v. Cyprus CYP 22/09/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Electoral rights / discrimination: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant as a member of the Turkish Cypriot community residing in the Government controlled area of Cyprus on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1996
B.B. v. the United Kingdom
B.B. v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/07/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of the applicant s sexual orientation due to this indictment for committing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3029
B.S. v. Spain
B.S. v. Spain ESP 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and discrimination: Lack of effective investigation into allegations of racially motivated ill treatment inflicted by police agents. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5760
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 10/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference by a Customs Department order closing the applicant company duty free business located inside the Leu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6778
BRAUER v. Germany
BRAUER v. Germany DEU 28/08/2009 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Discriminatory interference with the right to family life in that the applicant born out of wedlock was unable to assert her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38440
BUCHEN v. the Czech Republic
BUCHEN v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Discrimination: Unjustified difference in treatment between the applicant and various other categories of former members of the armed force resulting in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6058
CAM v. Turkey
CAM v. Turkey TUR 23/05/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: The case concerns violation of the right not to be discriminated against in conjunction with the right to education on account of the refusal of by the music academy to enroll a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37394
CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. Greece
CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. Greece GRC 16/12/1997 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the applicant church s inability to take legal action as a result of civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22146
CARVALHO PINTO DE SOUSA MORAIS v. Portugal
CARVALHO PINTO DE SOUSA MORAIS v. Portugal PRT 25/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment on the grounds of age and sex in the award of a reduced compensation in damages EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48155
CEGOLEA v. Romania
CEGOLEA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: In Romania the Constitution reserves one seat in the Chamber of Deputies to each national minority whose organisations do not attain the electoral threshold. This case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55723
CORNWELL v. the United Kingdom
CORNWELL v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2566
CROSSLAND v. the United Kingdom
CROSSLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 09/02/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as the national Widow s Bereavement Allowance was available only to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2552