Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 3181 - 3200 of 3305
WIESER v. Austria
WIESER v. Austria AUT 22/05/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Unjustified strip search during arrest amounting to degrading treatment. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1061
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979
WISSE v. France
WISSE v. France FRA 20/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the recording of remand detainees conversations with their relatives in detention centres visiting rooms. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33245
WITEK v. Poland
WITEK v. Poland POL 11/04/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful placement in a psychiatric hospital on the basis of an expert opinion delayed ordering and examination by the district court of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19105
WITKOWSKI v. Poland
WITKOWSKI v. Poland POL 13/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the applicant s inability to appeal against a judgment given against him by the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51865
WLOCH v. Poland (no. 2)
WLOCH v. Poland no. 2 POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Refusal of a domestic court to grant compensation under the relevant provisions for the applicant s unlawful detention on remand. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39929
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447
WORWA v. Poland
WORWA v. Poland POL 14/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unjustified interference due to the circumstances in which the applicant became subject to a series of psychiatric reports in criminal proceedings. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17755
WYSZYNSKI v. Poland
WYSZYNSKI v. Poland POL 24/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: Arbitrary dismissal in 2011 of a claim for compensation against the Poznan Municipality related to its failure to provide social housing to a tenant occupying the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60713
X AND Y v. Croatia
X AND Y v. Croatia HRV 03/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Denial of a fair hearing due to lack of procedural safeguards in proceedings divesting the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10109
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X.Y. v. Hungary
X.Y. v. Hungary HUN 19/06/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning different violations of the applicants right to liberty and security on account of a their unlawful detention Article 5 1 b their unreasonably long pre EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11104
X v. Croatia
X v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Exclusion of the applicants in the case of X the applicant was divested of her capacity to act while in the case of A.K. and L. the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10089
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia LVA 26/11/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Failure to satisfy the procedural requirements inherent in the right to respect for private life due to refusal by domestic courts to examine the conclusions of a psychological EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31110
X v. Poland
X v. Poland POL 28/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: Refusal to grant applicant full parental rights and custody over her youngest child in 2009 based solely or decisively on considerations regarding her sexual orientation violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59871
X v. Russia
X v. Russia RUS 20/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns unlawful deprivation of liberty on account of the applicant s involuntary placement in a psychiatric hospital between 24 April and 20 May 2014 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49659
X v. Slovenia
X v. Slovenia SVN 28/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to exercise the required diligence in the proceedings concerning the withdrawal of the applicant s parental rights which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7220
X v. Sweden
X v. Sweden SWE 09/04/2018 00:00:00 02/05/2018 10:26:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation ordered by the Migration Agency and confirmed by the Migration Court to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49349