Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1201 - 1220 of 1694
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PFLEGER v. Austria
PFLEGER v. Austria AUT 04/07/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing and of a public delivery of the decisions in land consolidation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-813
PHOSTIRA EFTHYMIOU AND RIBEIRO FERNANDES v. Portugal
PHOSTIRA EFTHYMIOU AND RIBEIRO FERNANDES v. Portugal PRT 01/06/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life: Infringement of a mother s and daughter s right to family life in the event of the execution of a decision to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9977
PIALOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece (no. 2)
PIALOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece no. 2 GRC 07/12/2017 00:00:00 16/01/2018 11:15:06 Case Description: Protection of property rights / functioning of justice / effective remedy: Authorities failure to settle the status of the applicants properties in terms EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48741
PIAZZI v. Italy
PIAZZI v. Italy ITA 02/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of juvenile courts and social services to make sufficient and adequate efforts to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28276
PIETRIS S.A. AND NASTAS v. the Republic of Moldova
PIETRIS S.A. AND NASTAS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 19/01/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court on account of the refusal of domestic courts to examine the applicants claim failing his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56893
PILCIC v. Croatia
PILCIC v. Croatia HRV 17/04/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in detention: Lack of adequate medical care for various health problems in prison. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11998
PINCOVA AND PINC v. the Czech Republic
PINCOVA AND PINC v. the Czech Republic CZE 05/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the restitution to its former owner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6060
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to introduce remedies that would provide the applicants with a reasonable opportunity to challenge the Bank of Slovenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59299
PIROGLU & KARAKAYA v. Turkey
PIROGLU KARAKAYA v. Turkey TUR 18/06/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice freedom of association and freedom of expression: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the failure to hold an oral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5594
PIRUZYAN v. Armenia
PIRUZYAN v. Armenia ARM 26/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:23:45 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in prison: Failure to provide adequate medical assistance in a detention facility and placement of the applicants in a metal cage during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12612
PISARI v. Russia
PISARI v. Russia RUS 19/10/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the killing on 1 January 2012 of the applicants son by a Russian soldier from the peacekeeping force of the Joint Control Commission as a result of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14060
PISHCHALNIKOV v. Russia
PISHCHALNIKOV v. Russia RUS 24/12/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to a fair trial mainly on account of the lack of legal assistance at the initial stages of police questioning and the use in evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13801
PISTOLIS AND OTHERS v. Greece
PISTOLIS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 04/09/2009 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate restriction of the right of access to the Court of Cassation due to its excessively formalistic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22670
PLA AND PUNCERNAU v. Andorra
PLA AND PUNCERNAU v. Andorra AND 15/12/2004 00:00:00 21/10/2016 09:27:35 Case Description: Discrimination: Exclusion of an adopted child from inheritance rights due to a respective interpretation of testamentary provision by the High Court of Justice. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-225
PLAKHTEYEV AND PLAKHTEYEVA v. Ukraine
PLAKHTEYEV AND PLAKHTEYEVA v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of property rights and functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court to claim damages for a wrongful fine and the unjustified seizure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31124
PLECHANOW v. Poland
PLECHANOW v. Poland POL 07/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Failure to comply with positive obligation to provide measures safeguarding the applicants right to the effective enjoyment of their possession: impossibility to obtain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39901
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
POITRIMOL v. France
POITRIMOL v. France FRA 23/11/1993 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court and thus of a fair trial on account of the declaration of inadmissibility ipso jure of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32907
POLAT v. Turkey
POLAT v. Turkey TUR 07/05/2019 00:00:00 10/05/2019 11:28:52 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to the criminal proceedings initiated against the applicants under various articles of the Criminal Code of Anti Terrorism EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51979