Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 47
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 10/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to provide sufficient reasons to justify the administrative detention in 2014 for five months and twenty days of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50019
BURES v. the Czech Republic
BURES v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/01/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:15:20 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Restraint and fastening of the applicant to a bed at Brno ernovice psychiatric hospital s sobering up centre and insufficiently EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. France
DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. France FRA 13/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Protection of family life and effective remedy: Lack of an effective remedy for a Brazilian national who was removed from French Guiana an overseas EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28442
FEILAZOO v. Malta
FEILAZOO v. Malta MLT 11/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns the inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention pending deportation in the periods from 16 to 23 May 2019 and from 15 September 2019 to 13 November EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57955
FILAS v. Poland
FILAS v. Poland POL 15/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: Continued routine and discriminate application of full range of security measures under the dangerous detainee regime between 2014 2017 in particular strip searches despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57483
G.U. v. Turkey
G.U. v. Turkey TUR 18/01/2017 00:00:00 04/04/2017 11:44:07 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment and a violation of the right to respect for private and family life on account of lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46531
GABRIELYAN v. Armenia
GABRIELYAN v. Armenia ARM 10/07/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Gabrielyan 8088/05 judgment of 10/04/2012 final on 10/07/2012 Manucharyan 35688/11 judgment of 24/11/2016 final on 24/02/2017 Asatryan 3571/09 judgment of 27/04/2017 final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-351
GHIGO v. Malta
GHIGO v. Malta MLT 26/12/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3179
GOMI v. Turkey
GOMI v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns failure of the authorities to place the applicant who had been sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment and suffering from a psychotic illness since 2003 in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52507
GRINBERG v. Russia
GRINBERG v. Russia RUS 21/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation under civil law following an article criticising a political candidate and a complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27730
GURBAN v. Turkey
GURBAN v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: This group of cases concern violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants sentences to aggravated life EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36750
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania ROU 13/04/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:28:55 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s ill treatment on account of failure by the authorities to provide the applicant with food for about 10 hours in March 2010 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17609
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The application No. 65286/13 concerns violations of the rights of the applicant a renowned investigative journalist to respect for her private life and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52409
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213