Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
CEGOLEA v. Romania
CEGOLEA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: In Romania the Constitution reserves one seat in the Chamber of Deputies to each national minority whose organisations do not attain the electoral threshold. This case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55723
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CERVENKA v. the Czech Republic
CERVENKA v. the Czech Republic CZE 13/01/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 12:47:30 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Placement in a social care home without sufficient guarantees against arbitrariness and possibility to seek compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46183
FERHATOVIC v. Slovenia
FERHATOVIC v. Slovenia SVN 14/11/2022 00:00:00 05/12/2022 18:05:55 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s property rights due to his inability to obtain compensation following the non Convention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62070
GAVRILOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova
GAVRILOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interferences by domestic courts on account of the applicants convictions for defamation or public protest without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6840
GELERI v. Romania
GELERI v. Romania ROU 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and issues related to expulsion/deportation: Arbitrary expulsion of a political refugee and interdiction to enter the territory for 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16899
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
M.R. AND D.R. v. Ukraine
M.R. AND D.R. v. Ukraine UKR 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: The present cases concern the implementation of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction the Hague Convention in Ukraine and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50167
N. v. Romania (no. 2)
N. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 16/02/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental health conditions substantive violation of Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59831
NAMAT ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAT ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 08/07/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: This group of 25 cases concerns violations of the right to free elections Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 of members of opposition parties or independent candidates in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1773
NAVALNYY AND OFITSEROV v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND OFITSEROV v. Russia RUS 04/07/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy and Mr Petr Ofitserov of organising and facilitating large scale EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13537
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
PISKIN v. Turkey
PISKIN v. Turkey TUR 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national courts to conduct an in depth thorough examination of the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57513
PONCELET v. Belgium
PONCELET v. Belgium BEL 04/10/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence due to the prosecution of senior civil servant on basis of reports compiled during an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1531
SYKORA v. the Czech Republic
SYKORA v. the Czech Republic CZE 22/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Unlawful detention in a psychiatric hospital of a person deprived of legal capacity: lack of safeguards against arbitrariness and judicial review of the detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6400
ZAYIDOV v. Azerbaijan (no. 2)
ZAYIDOV v. Azerbaijan no. 2 AZE 24/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: The present case concerns destruction of the applicant s book manuscript by the detention facility administration. The Court found that the interference with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60703